東華大學圖書館 |

Assessing Predator Risk to Diadromous Fish Conservation in the Penobscot River Estuary.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Assessing Predator Risk to Diadromous Fish Conservation in the Penobscot River Estuary./
作者:	Leach, Lauri.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	125 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International83-02.
標題:	Dams. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28475321
ISBN:	9798505569276

Assessing Predator Risk to Diadromous Fish Conservation in the Penobscot River Estuary.
Leach, Lauri.

Assessing Predator Risk to Diadromous Fish Conservation in the Penobscot River Estuary. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 125 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02.

Thesis (M.Sc.)--The University of Maine, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Successful conservation of pinnipeds in the northwest Atlantic has led to increasing populations of harbor (Phoca vitulina) and gray seals (Halichoerus grypus) in the Gulf of Maine. Seals are often perceived as predators and competitors for fish, and as a result, come into conflict with fisheries and fish conservation. Increasing numbers of seals have become a recent concern in the Penobscot River Estuary in Maine, as habitat restoration and diadromous fish conservation have been top priorities in this region for the past decade.To understand how pinnipeds are responding to these efforts, as well as the risks they pose to diadromous fish, we evaluated spatial and temporal overlaps in the presence of seals and diadromous fish from 2012 to 2020. Utilizing data from a survey in the estuary, counts of seals on haul-outs, as well as presence of swimming seals, were compared across seasons and years, and related to fish biomass estimates. Seal presence in the estuary peaks in the spring, and we did not detect significant differences in counts of hauled out seals in recent years. We detected a non-significant, negative relationship between seal count and fish biomass, presumably due to relative presence of each peaking in different seasons.Seal predation of endangered Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) is a concern, so we assessed the risk seals pose to salmon. Salmon demographic data, including the presence of seal-induced injury, have been collected from salmon passing upriver at the southernmost dams. A comparison of seal-induced injury rate from 2012 to 2019 revealed that seal-induced injury has been declining. Rather than being most influenced by local seal populations, increasing river herring returns were strongly related to declining seal-induced injury rates, highlighting the importance of prey buffering in this system.We used photo-identification to understand how individual seals are using the estuary. Photographs were taken of individual seals between 2019 and 2020. Overall, 27 harbor seals and 88 gray seals were identified. There were 62 harbor seal and 29 gray seal resighting events. Continued efforts could allow for eventual abundance estimates of gray seals using the lower estuary. Comparison to other photo-identification catalogs in the region would also allow a better understanding of how these animals utilize regional sites and an improved understanding of the role pinnipeds play in marine and coastal ecosystems.It appears that seal presence in the Penobscot is based more on regional trends in seal abundance and distribution rather than local prey biomass, however, it is possible that pinnipeds may be slower to respond to restoration efforts than the fish species in this system. Better understanding pinniped response to restoration and changing predator-prey interactions in this system could help reconcile the competing objectives of marine mammal protection and fish restoration. A multi-species approach is essential to successful conservation. A healthier ecosystem can benefit both predators and prey, as improved water quality, increased access to historic habitat, and rebounding fish populations are already proving to have significant benefits to multiple species that use the river.

ISBN: 9798505569276Subjects--Topical Terms:

587778
Dams.

Assessing Predator Risk to Diadromous Fish Conservation in the Penobscot River Estuary.
LDR:04419nmm a2200409 4500 001 2346200
005 20220620110442.5
008 241004s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798505569276
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28475321
035 $a (MiAaPQ)U_Maine4400
035 $a AAI28475321
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Leach, Lauri. $3 3685253
245 1 0 $a Assessing Predator Risk to Diadromous Fish Conservation in the Penobscot River Estuary.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 125 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02.
500 $a Advisor: Cammen, Kristina.
502 $a Thesis (M.Sc.)--The University of Maine, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Successful conservation of pinnipeds in the northwest Atlantic has led to increasing populations of harbor (Phoca vitulina) and gray seals (Halichoerus grypus) in the Gulf of Maine. Seals are often perceived as predators and competitors for fish, and as a result, come into conflict with fisheries and fish conservation. Increasing numbers of seals have become a recent concern in the Penobscot River Estuary in Maine, as habitat restoration and diadromous fish conservation have been top priorities in this region for the past decade.To understand how pinnipeds are responding to these efforts, as well as the risks they pose to diadromous fish, we evaluated spatial and temporal overlaps in the presence of seals and diadromous fish from 2012 to 2020. Utilizing data from a survey in the estuary, counts of seals on haul-outs, as well as presence of swimming seals, were compared across seasons and years, and related to fish biomass estimates. Seal presence in the estuary peaks in the spring, and we did not detect significant differences in counts of hauled out seals in recent years. We detected a non-significant, negative relationship between seal count and fish biomass, presumably due to relative presence of each peaking in different seasons.Seal predation of endangered Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) is a concern, so we assessed the risk seals pose to salmon. Salmon demographic data, including the presence of seal-induced injury, have been collected from salmon passing upriver at the southernmost dams. A comparison of seal-induced injury rate from 2012 to 2019 revealed that seal-induced injury has been declining. Rather than being most influenced by local seal populations, increasing river herring returns were strongly related to declining seal-induced injury rates, highlighting the importance of prey buffering in this system.We used photo-identification to understand how individual seals are using the estuary. Photographs were taken of individual seals between 2019 and 2020. Overall, 27 harbor seals and 88 gray seals were identified. There were 62 harbor seal and 29 gray seal resighting events. Continued efforts could allow for eventual abundance estimates of gray seals using the lower estuary. Comparison to other photo-identification catalogs in the region would also allow a better understanding of how these animals utilize regional sites and an improved understanding of the role pinnipeds play in marine and coastal ecosystems.It appears that seal presence in the Penobscot is based more on regional trends in seal abundance and distribution rather than local prey biomass, however, it is possible that pinnipeds may be slower to respond to restoration efforts than the fish species in this system. Better understanding pinniped response to restoration and changing predator-prey interactions in this system could help reconcile the competing objectives of marine mammal protection and fish restoration. A multi-species approach is essential to successful conservation. A healthier ecosystem can benefit both predators and prey, as improved water quality, increased access to historic habitat, and rebounding fish populations are already proving to have significant benefits to multiple species that use the river.
590 $a School code: 0113.
650 4 $a Dams. $3 587778
650 4 $a Fisheries. $3 609669
650 4 $a Identification. $3 827285
650 4 $a Generalized linear models. $3 3561810
650 4 $a Seasons. $3 523975
650 4 $a Animal behavior. $3 587929
650 4 $a Commercial fishing. $3 3558770
650 4 $a Population growth. $3 3562887
650 4 $a Diet. $3 626002
650 4 $a Biomass. $3 1013462
650 4 $a Ecosystems. $3 595401
650 4 $a Summer. $3 800184
650 4 $a Cod. $3 3685254
650 4 $a Endangered & extinct species. $3 3560222
650 4 $a Estuaries. $3 546065
650 4 $a River ecology. $3 3685237
650 4 $a Binomial distribution. $3 3562291
650 4 $a Probability. $3 518898
650 4 $a Fishing. $3 566322
650 4 $a Marine mammals. $3 681032
650 4 $a Extinction. $3 3685255
650 4 $a Variance analysis. $3 3544969
650 4 $a Fish. $3 3564374
650 4 $a Aquatic sciences. $3 3174300
650 4 $a Biological oceanography. $3 2122748
650 4 $a Mathematics. $3 515831
650 4 $a Biology. $3 522710
650 4 $a Ecology. $3 516476
650 4 $a Statistics. $3 517247
650 4 $a Recreation. $3 535376
650 4 $a Behavioral sciences. $3 529833
650 4 $a Animal sciences. $3 3174829
690 $a 0475
690 $a 0792
690 $a 0602
690 $a 0416
690 $a 0306
690 $a 0329
690 $a 0338
690 $a 0405
690 $a 0814
690 $a 0463
710 2 $a The University of Maine. $3 1029373
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 83-02.
790 $a 0113
791 $a M.Sc.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28475321