東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Impact of Behavior Analysis Jargon on the Effective Training of Stakeholders.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Impact of Behavior Analysis Jargon on the Effective Training of Stakeholders./
Author:	Marshall, Kimberly B.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
Description:	164 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-03B.
Subject:	Technical communication. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28650573
ISBN:	9798535534541

The Impact of Behavior Analysis Jargon on the Effective Training of Stakeholders.
Marshall, Kimberly B.

The Impact of Behavior Analysis Jargon on the Effective Training of Stakeholders. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 164 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Endicott College, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

There has been a long-standing debate in the field of behavior analysis about the impact and value of behavior analytic technical terminology. Some have argued that jargon negatively impacts the dissemination of the science while others have asserted that technical terminology is necessary for precise descriptions of behavior. Previous research has shown that technical terminology elicits negative emotional reactions in the general public (Critchfield et al., 2017a; Critchfield et al., 2017b; Critchfield & Doepke, 2018) and has a detrimental impact on the implementation of behavior analysis procedures by therapists (Jarmolowicz et al., 2008). A total of 68 parents of individuals with disabilities participated in the present series of three studies. In Studies One and Two, parents completed a pre-evaluation, allowing for jargon to be individually determined for each participant, based on their existing knowledge of the technical terms. In Study One, parents implemented discrete trial teaching after accessing written instructions with high or low percentages of jargon in-person, and in Study Two, they did so via telehealth. Both studies showed that higher amounts of behavior analytic jargon decreased parents' ability to implement behavior analytic procedures, with statistically significant results found in the in-person format. In Study Three, parents of individuals with disabilities rated the emotional effect of behavior analytic terms as almost exclusively unhappy. These findings, consistent with the previous literature, show that technical terminology does have a deleterious effect on the dissemination of behavior analysis. Future directions for research are suggested including evaluating the impact of jargon on the efficacy of additional empirically supported training procedures and extending this approach to other populations with whom behavior analysts regularly interact.

ISBN: 9798535534541Subjects--Topical Terms:

3172863
Technical communication.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Applied behavior analysis

The Impact of Behavior Analysis Jargon on the Effective Training of Stakeholders.
LDR:03134nmm a2200409 4500 001 2345689
005 20220613063756.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798535534541
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28650573
035 $a AAI28650573
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Marshall, Kimberly B. $3 3684677
245 1 4 $a The Impact of Behavior Analysis Jargon on the Effective Training of Stakeholders.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 164 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Weiss, Mary Jane.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Endicott College, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a There has been a long-standing debate in the field of behavior analysis about the impact and value of behavior analytic technical terminology. Some have argued that jargon negatively impacts the dissemination of the science while others have asserted that technical terminology is necessary for precise descriptions of behavior. Previous research has shown that technical terminology elicits negative emotional reactions in the general public (Critchfield et al., 2017a; Critchfield et al., 2017b; Critchfield & Doepke, 2018) and has a detrimental impact on the implementation of behavior analysis procedures by therapists (Jarmolowicz et al., 2008). A total of 68 parents of individuals with disabilities participated in the present series of three studies. In Studies One and Two, parents completed a pre-evaluation, allowing for jargon to be individually determined for each participant, based on their existing knowledge of the technical terms. In Study One, parents implemented discrete trial teaching after accessing written instructions with high or low percentages of jargon in-person, and in Study Two, they did so via telehealth. Both studies showed that higher amounts of behavior analytic jargon decreased parents' ability to implement behavior analytic procedures, with statistically significant results found in the in-person format. In Study Three, parents of individuals with disabilities rated the emotional effect of behavior analytic terms as almost exclusively unhappy. These findings, consistent with the previous literature, show that technical terminology does have a deleterious effect on the dissemination of behavior analysis. Future directions for research are suggested including evaluating the impact of jargon on the efficacy of additional empirically supported training procedures and extending this approach to other populations with whom behavior analysts regularly interact.
590 $a School code: 1812.
650 4 $a Technical communication. $3 3172863
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
650 4 $a Sociolinguistics. $3 524467
650 4 $a Parents & parenting. $3 3562799
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
650 4 $a Teaching. $3 517098
650 4 $a Students. $3 756581
650 4 $a Therapists. $3 3564388
650 4 $a Science. $3 516376
650 4 $a Audiences. $3 618475
650 4 $a Telemedicine. $3 841772
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Demographics. $3 3540640
650 4 $a Values. $3 518648
650 4 $a Intervention. $3 3435307
650 4 $a Behavior disorders. $3 3684311
650 4 $a Families & family life. $3 3422406
650 4 $a Feedback. $3 677181
650 4 $a Skills. $3 3221615
650 4 $a COVID-19. $3 3554449
650 4 $a Experiments. $3 525909
650 4 $a Medical research. $2 bicssc $3 1556686
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Children & youth. $3 3541389
650 4 $a Ratings & rankings. $3 3562221
650 4 $a Coronaviruses. $3 894828
650 4 $a Systematic review. $3 3680549
650 4 $a Semantics. $3 520060
653 $a Applied behavior analysis
653 $a Dissemination
653 $a Jargon
653 $a Parent training
653 $a Technical terminology
690 $a 0643
690 $a 0636
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0679
710 2 $a Endicott College. $b Applied Behavioral Analysis. $3 3286699
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-03B.
790 $a 1812
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28650573