東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

In-Group Versus Out-Group: Examining Truth-Bias and Language Use in Inter-Group Communication.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	In-Group Versus Out-Group: Examining Truth-Bias and Language Use in Inter-Group Communication./
作者:	Fan, Xiaoti.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	83 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-03B.
標題:	Communication. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28643292
ISBN:	9798544235538

In-Group Versus Out-Group: Examining Truth-Bias and Language Use in Inter-Group Communication.
Fan, Xiaoti.

In-Group Versus Out-Group: Examining Truth-Bias and Language Use in Inter-Group Communication. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 83 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Alabama, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This dissertation is guided by the central premise of truth-default theory that examined whether truth-bias holds for communication with out-group members compared to communication with in-group members. Additionally, this dissertation investigated whether suspicion trigger sensitivity is higher for out-group members than in-group members. Participants were recruited to watch four speakers from the U.S. and China, and judged their honesty. The results suggested that people hold a stronger truth-bias towards those perceived as in-group members when that member shared the same opinion as them on the social issue. However, the results did not reveal a stronger truth-bias towards those who shared and valued the same culture. Moreover, all participants showed a higher suspicion trigger sensitivity towards out-group members who were from the different culture as them, and higher suspicion trigger sensitivity was also evident for those who shared different opinions on a social issue. Additionally, an investigation of language patterns was conducted that explored 24 speakers' language usage when discussing a personal relationship topic and a social topic. Language patterns of all speakers were analyzing in their use of first personal pronouns, negative emotion words, motion words, and exclusive terms.

ISBN: 9798544235538Subjects--Topical Terms:

524709
Communication.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Culture

In-Group Versus Out-Group: Examining Truth-Bias and Language Use in Inter-Group Communication.
LDR:02457nmm a2200361 4500 001 2345577
005 20230119160024.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798544235538
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28643292
035 $a AAI28643292
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Fan, Xiaoti. $3 3684541
245 1 0 $a In-Group Versus Out-Group: Examining Truth-Bias and Language Use in Inter-Group Communication.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 83 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Griffin, Darrin J.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Alabama, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This dissertation is guided by the central premise of truth-default theory that examined whether truth-bias holds for communication with out-group members compared to communication with in-group members. Additionally, this dissertation investigated whether suspicion trigger sensitivity is higher for out-group members than in-group members. Participants were recruited to watch four speakers from the U.S. and China, and judged their honesty. The results suggested that people hold a stronger truth-bias towards those perceived as in-group members when that member shared the same opinion as them on the social issue. However, the results did not reveal a stronger truth-bias towards those who shared and valued the same culture. Moreover, all participants showed a higher suspicion trigger sensitivity towards out-group members who were from the different culture as them, and higher suspicion trigger sensitivity was also evident for those who shared different opinions on a social issue. Additionally, an investigation of language patterns was conducted that explored 24 speakers' language usage when discussing a personal relationship topic and a social topic. Language patterns of all speakers were analyzing in their use of first personal pronouns, negative emotion words, motion words, and exclusive terms.
590 $a School code: 0004.
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Emotions. $3 524569
650 4 $a Deception. $3 535647
650 4 $a Masks. $3 546499
650 4 $a COVID-19. $3 3554449
650 4 $a Bias. $2 gtt $3 1374837
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
653 $a Culture
653 $a Deception
653 $a Suspicion trigger sensitivity
653 $a Truth-bias
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0679
690 $a 0451
710 2 $a The University of Alabama. $b Communication & Information Sciences. $3 1680392
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-03B.
790 $a 0004
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28643292