東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Efficacy of Auditory-Verbal Therapy (AVT) Over Total Communication (TC) for Language Outcomes in Children with Cochlear Implants: A Systematic Review.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Efficacy of Auditory-Verbal Therapy (AVT) Over Total Communication (TC) for Language Outcomes in Children with Cochlear Implants: A Systematic Review./
作者:	Shoffner, Amber.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	92 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International79-01.
標題:	Speech therapy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10262352
ISBN:	9781369872101

Efficacy of Auditory-Verbal Therapy (AVT) Over Total Communication (TC) for Language Outcomes in Children with Cochlear Implants: A Systematic Review.
Shoffner, Amber.

Efficacy of Auditory-Verbal Therapy (AVT) Over Total Communication (TC) for Language Outcomes in Children with Cochlear Implants: A Systematic Review. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 92 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01.

Thesis (M.S.)--The University of Alabama, 2017.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Children with cochlear implants require intervention for both receptive and expressive language. Auditory-Verbal Therapy (AVT), which primarily focuses on the development of language through the auditory channel, and Total Communication (TC), which allows for the combination of sign, lipreading, and auditory stimuli for language development, are two intervention methods often used for children with CIs. This systematic review presents language outcomes in children using AVT and TC intervention approaches. We hypothesized that the use of AVT would result in better expressive language outcomes compared to the use of TC. We also hypothesized that both intervention approaches would result in equivalent receptive language outcomes. We found that children who received AVT had a higher percentage of favorable outcomes for both receptive and expressive language outcomes compared to children who used TC. Other additional factors were found to be significant for language outcomes such as age at implantation, communication mode, parent/family involvement, age at diagnosis, device differences, additional disabilities, socioeconomic status, and gender. Overall, we found a lack of research literature directly comparing AVT and TC. A large-scale systematic study of the interventions is still needed in order for professionals and families to make firm conclusions on the efficacy of these treatments for children with cochlear implants.

ISBN: 9781369872101Subjects--Topical Terms:

520446
Speech therapy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Auditory-verbal therapy

Efficacy of Auditory-Verbal Therapy (AVT) Over Total Communication (TC) for Language Outcomes in Children with Cochlear Implants: A Systematic Review.
LDR:02784nmm a2200397 4500 001 2344264
005 20220523132417.5
008 241004s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369872101
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10262352
035 $a (MiAaPQ)alatus:13063
035 $a AAI10262352
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Shoffner, Amber. $3 3683032
245 1 0 $a Efficacy of Auditory-Verbal Therapy (AVT) Over Total Communication (TC) for Language Outcomes in Children with Cochlear Implants: A Systematic Review.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 92 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Hay-McCutcheon, Marcia.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--The University of Alabama, 2017.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Children with cochlear implants require intervention for both receptive and expressive language. Auditory-Verbal Therapy (AVT), which primarily focuses on the development of language through the auditory channel, and Total Communication (TC), which allows for the combination of sign, lipreading, and auditory stimuli for language development, are two intervention methods often used for children with CIs. This systematic review presents language outcomes in children using AVT and TC intervention approaches. We hypothesized that the use of AVT would result in better expressive language outcomes compared to the use of TC. We also hypothesized that both intervention approaches would result in equivalent receptive language outcomes. We found that children who received AVT had a higher percentage of favorable outcomes for both receptive and expressive language outcomes compared to children who used TC. Other additional factors were found to be significant for language outcomes such as age at implantation, communication mode, parent/family involvement, age at diagnosis, device differences, additional disabilities, socioeconomic status, and gender. Overall, we found a lack of research literature directly comparing AVT and TC. A large-scale systematic study of the interventions is still needed in order for professionals and families to make firm conclusions on the efficacy of these treatments for children with cochlear implants.
590 $a School code: 0004.
650 4 $a Speech therapy. $3 520446
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
653 $a Auditory-verbal therapy
653 $a Aural rehabilitation
653 $a Cochlear implants
653 $a Expressive language
653 $a Receptive language
653 $a Total communication
690 $a 0460
690 $a 0529
710 2 $a The University of Alabama. $b Speech Language Pathology. $3 3287313
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 79-01.
790 $a 0004
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10262352