東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Gentle Remediation Options (GRO) for Managing Risks and Providing Ecosystem Services at Contaminated Sites.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Gentle Remediation Options (GRO) for Managing Risks and Providing Ecosystem Services at Contaminated Sites./
作者:	Drenning, Paul David.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	84 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-07, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-07A.
標題:	Fungi. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28928921
ISBN:	9798762124263

Gentle Remediation Options (GRO) for Managing Risks and Providing Ecosystem Services at Contaminated Sites.
Drenning, Paul David.

Gentle Remediation Options (GRO) for Managing Risks and Providing Ecosystem Services at Contaminated Sites. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 84 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-07, Section: A.

Thesis (Licentiate)--Chalmers Tekniska Hogskola (Sweden), 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Soils are a non-renewable resource and comprise a key component of the world's stock of natural capital. Due to industrialisation, urbanisation and other patterns of unsustainable development, widespread land degradation in the form of contamination, soil sealing, compaction, etc. has impaired the capacity of soils to perform their essential functions and provide humans with vital ecosystem services. Brownfields are typically urban or peri-urban sites that have been affected by the former uses of the site, are or are perceived to be contaminated, and require intervention to bring them back to beneficial use. They also constitute an important and underutilised land and soil resource to provide ecosystem services in urban areas as an element of green infrastructure through the use of nature-based solutions such as gentle remediation options (GRO). Gentle Remediation Options (GRO) are remediation measures involving plants, fungi, bacteria, and soil amendments that can be applied to manage risks at contaminated sites. Several studies and decision-support tools promote the wider range of benefits provided by GRO, including improving soil function to provide ecosystem services, but there is still scepticism regarding GRO implementation. Interviews with a small group of experts have elucidated some of the main possibilities and challenges for GRO implementation in Sweden. As a result, a risk management framework for GRO has been developed to strengthen the decision basis for GRO implementation in practice and address some of the key issues that need to be better communicated, including the various risk mitigation mechanisms, the required risk reduction for an envisioned land use, and the time perspective associated with the risk mitigation mechanisms. The framework is envisioned to be used as a tool for risk communication with stakeholders, decision-makers and regulatory agencies to identify GRO strategies for managing risks at contaminated sites and supporting phytomanagement for sustainable remediation and development. Two case studies are used to demonstrate the application of the risk management framework: Polstjarnegatan and Kolleberga.

ISBN: 9798762124263Subjects--Topical Terms:

571472
Fungi.

Gentle Remediation Options (GRO) for Managing Risks and Providing Ecosystem Services at Contaminated Sites.
LDR:03369nmm a2200385 4500 001 2343410
005 20220502104248.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798762124263
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28928921
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Chalmers_SE526431
035 $a AAI28928921
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Drenning, Paul David. $3 3681970
245 1 0 $a Gentle Remediation Options (GRO) for Managing Risks and Providing Ecosystem Services at Contaminated Sites.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 84 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-07, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Norrman, Jenny.
502 $a Thesis (Licentiate)--Chalmers Tekniska Hogskola (Sweden), 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Soils are a non-renewable resource and comprise a key component of the world's stock of natural capital. Due to industrialisation, urbanisation and other patterns of unsustainable development, widespread land degradation in the form of contamination, soil sealing, compaction, etc. has impaired the capacity of soils to perform their essential functions and provide humans with vital ecosystem services. Brownfields are typically urban or peri-urban sites that have been affected by the former uses of the site, are or are perceived to be contaminated, and require intervention to bring them back to beneficial use. They also constitute an important and underutilised land and soil resource to provide ecosystem services in urban areas as an element of green infrastructure through the use of nature-based solutions such as gentle remediation options (GRO). Gentle Remediation Options (GRO) are remediation measures involving plants, fungi, bacteria, and soil amendments that can be applied to manage risks at contaminated sites. Several studies and decision-support tools promote the wider range of benefits provided by GRO, including improving soil function to provide ecosystem services, but there is still scepticism regarding GRO implementation. Interviews with a small group of experts have elucidated some of the main possibilities and challenges for GRO implementation in Sweden. As a result, a risk management framework for GRO has been developed to strengthen the decision basis for GRO implementation in practice and address some of the key issues that need to be better communicated, including the various risk mitigation mechanisms, the required risk reduction for an envisioned land use, and the time perspective associated with the risk mitigation mechanisms. The framework is envisioned to be used as a tool for risk communication with stakeholders, decision-makers and regulatory agencies to identify GRO strategies for managing risks at contaminated sites and supporting phytomanagement for sustainable remediation and development. Two case studies are used to demonstrate the application of the risk management framework: Polstjarnegatan and Kolleberga.
590 $a School code: 0419.
650 4 $a Fungi. $3 571472
650 4 $a Bioremediation. $3 677632
650 4 $a Disease. $3 705846
650 4 $a Bacteria. $3 550366
650 4 $a Aggregates. $3 3564159
650 4 $a Decomposition. $3 3561186
650 4 $a Biology. $3 522710
650 4 $a Brownfields. $3 3681971
650 4 $a Ecosystems. $3 595401
650 4 $a Predation. $3 3562921
650 4 $a Contamination. $3 3681972
650 4 $a Nitrogen. $3 1314426
650 4 $a Vegetation. $3 3560047
650 4 $a Regulation. $3 3561775
650 4 $a Soil sciences. $3 2122699
650 4 $a Carbon. $3 604057
650 4 $a Invertebrates. $3 600655
650 4 $a Microorganisms. $3 666946
650 4 $a Agronomy. $3 2122783
650 4 $a Animal sciences. $3 3174829
650 4 $a Natural resource management. $3 589570
650 4 $a Microbiology. $3 536250
650 4 $a Sustainability. $3 1029978
690 $a 0306
690 $a 0481
690 $a 0285
690 $a 0475
690 $a 0528
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0410
690 $a 0640
710 2 $a Chalmers Tekniska Hogskola (Sweden). $3 1913472
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-07A.
790 $a 0419
791 $a Licentiate
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28928921