東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

"Thinking Like Lawyers" in the Online Environment: Students' and Faculty Members' Perceptions of Using the Socratic Method in an Online J.D. Course.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	"Thinking Like Lawyers" in the Online Environment: Students' and Faculty Members' Perceptions of Using the Socratic Method in an Online J.D. Course./
作者:	VanZandt, Victoria L.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	249 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-12A.
標題:	Legal studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28642775
ISBN:	9798516910302

"Thinking Like Lawyers" in the Online Environment: Students' and Faculty Members' Perceptions of Using the Socratic Method in an Online J.D. Course.
VanZandt, Victoria L.

"Thinking Like Lawyers" in the Online Environment: Students' and Faculty Members' Perceptions of Using the Socratic Method in an Online J.D. Course. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 249 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Dr.Ph.)--University of Dayton, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

With the American Bar Association's recent move to a more liberal stance on distance learning and the newly gained experience with online education for all law students and legal educators due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is clear that online legal education, in some form, is here to stay. Additionally, there is no indication that the Socratic method with its strong ties to legal education will be abandoned. Therefore, the legal academy must address how it can continue to use the Socratic method as its preferred pedagogical tool to teach students "to think like lawyers" in online modalities. This mixed methods phenomenological case study explored the perceptions of faculty members and traditional first-semester law students regarding the use of the Socratic method in an online J.D. course. The study used the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework as a lens through which to assess the students' perceptions of the course. The study involved the CoI survey, interviews with students and the faculty members involved in the course, and observations of the Socratic method in the synchronous Zoom sessions and the use of a simulated Socratic dialogue in the asynchronous modules in the course. The findings were supported by the research concerning online learning and the Socratic method and added insights into this group of traditional first-semester law students, who began their legal education online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, results from this study demonstrate that the Socratic method continues to be the expected pedagogy in law school doctrinal classes by both faculty and students; the Socratic method employed in the synchronous Zoom classes were similar to the traditional Socratic method used in face-to face classes with its inherent benefits and drawbacks; that the asynchronous use of the Socratic method addressed some of those drawbacks; and that the CoI framework supported the findings regarding the Socratic method.

ISBN: 9798516910302Subjects--Topical Terms:

3283754
Legal studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Socratic method

"Thinking Like Lawyers" in the Online Environment: Students' and Faculty Members' Perceptions of Using the Socratic Method in an Online J.D. Course.
LDR:03216nmm a2200349 4500 001 2342224
005 20211209144715.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798516910302
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28642775
035 $a (MiAaPQ)OhioLINKdayton1618827751771636
035 $a AAI28642775
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a VanZandt, Victoria L. $3 3680560
245 1 0 $a "Thinking Like Lawyers" in the Online Environment: Students' and Faculty Members' Perceptions of Using the Socratic Method in an Online J.D. Course.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 249 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Schmitt, Jeff;Smith, Larry;Ziskin, Mary.
502 $a Thesis (Dr.Ph.)--University of Dayton, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a With the American Bar Association's recent move to a more liberal stance on distance learning and the newly gained experience with online education for all law students and legal educators due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is clear that online legal education, in some form, is here to stay. Additionally, there is no indication that the Socratic method with its strong ties to legal education will be abandoned. Therefore, the legal academy must address how it can continue to use the Socratic method as its preferred pedagogical tool to teach students "to think like lawyers" in online modalities. This mixed methods phenomenological case study explored the perceptions of faculty members and traditional first-semester law students regarding the use of the Socratic method in an online J.D. course. The study used the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework as a lens through which to assess the students' perceptions of the course. The study involved the CoI survey, interviews with students and the faculty members involved in the course, and observations of the Socratic method in the synchronous Zoom sessions and the use of a simulated Socratic dialogue in the asynchronous modules in the course. The findings were supported by the research concerning online learning and the Socratic method and added insights into this group of traditional first-semester law students, who began their legal education online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, results from this study demonstrate that the Socratic method continues to be the expected pedagogy in law school doctrinal classes by both faculty and students; the Socratic method employed in the synchronous Zoom classes were similar to the traditional Socratic method used in face-to face classes with its inherent benefits and drawbacks; that the asynchronous use of the Socratic method addressed some of those drawbacks; and that the CoI framework supported the findings regarding the Socratic method.
590 $a School code: 0327.
650 4 $a Legal studies. $3 3283754
653 $a Socratic method
653 $a Legal education
653 $a Online legal education
653 $a Community of inquiry
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a University of Dayton. $b Educational Leadership. $3 3555447
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-12A.
790 $a 0327
791 $a Dr.Ph.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28642775