東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Socratic Paradoxes and Plato's E...

Hannan, Natalie.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Socratic Paradoxes and Plato's Epistemology.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Socratic Paradoxes and Plato's Epistemology./
作者:	Hannan, Natalie.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	175 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-10, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-10A.
標題:	Ethics. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28415951
ISBN:	9798708749062

The Socratic Paradoxes and Plato's Epistemology.
Hannan, Natalie.

The Socratic Paradoxes and Plato's Epistemology. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 175 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-10, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Plato's "Socratic paradoxes" state that no one does wrong voluntarily and that virtue is knowledge. Outside of moral psychology, the importance of the Socratic paradoxes has been neglected. My dissertation defends two related proposals that showcase their importance in ancient epistemology. The first proposal is that they are a major motivation for Plato to develop a unique view of episteme (knowledge or understanding) as an infallible and robust cognitive power that is set over a special class of objects. The second proposal is that understanding the influence of the Socratic paradoxes can help us see how episteme improves our doxai (beliefs or opinions) about the world around us, solving a long-standing problem in Plato's epistemology. I will start by examining the Hippias Minor, in which we see Plato seeking to embrace the Socratic paradoxes (rather than already assuming them) and looking to develop his notion of episteme as a result. I will then move to the Protagoras, in order to show Plato proceeding with this project by embracing episteme as something that produces good action and involves measurement. I will show the Protagoras' picture to be fully developed in the Republic, in which episteme emerges as something that measures the truth of our doxai and has clear practical benefits as a result. Finally, I will compare this account to Aristotle's treatment of virtue and episteme in the Eudemian Ethics, in order to consider the legacy of the Socratic paradoxes after Plato.

ISBN: 9798708749062Subjects--Topical Terms:

517264
Ethics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Ancient philosophy

The Socratic Paradoxes and Plato's Epistemology.
LDR:02607nmm a2200373 4500 001 2283127
005 20211022115649.5
008 220723s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798708749062
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28415951
035 $a AAI28415951
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hannan, Natalie. $3 3562043
245 1 4 $a The Socratic Paradoxes and Plato's Epistemology.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 175 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-10, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Vogt, Katja M.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Plato's "Socratic paradoxes" state that no one does wrong voluntarily and that virtue is knowledge. Outside of moral psychology, the importance of the Socratic paradoxes has been neglected. My dissertation defends two related proposals that showcase their importance in ancient epistemology. The first proposal is that they are a major motivation for Plato to develop a unique view of episteme (knowledge or understanding) as an infallible and robust cognitive power that is set over a special class of objects. The second proposal is that understanding the influence of the Socratic paradoxes can help us see how episteme improves our doxai (beliefs or opinions) about the world around us, solving a long-standing problem in Plato's epistemology. I will start by examining the Hippias Minor, in which we see Plato seeking to embrace the Socratic paradoxes (rather than already assuming them) and looking to develop his notion of episteme as a result. I will then move to the Protagoras, in order to show Plato proceeding with this project by embracing episteme as something that produces good action and involves measurement. I will show the Protagoras' picture to be fully developed in the Republic, in which episteme emerges as something that measures the truth of our doxai and has clear practical benefits as a result. Finally, I will compare this account to Aristotle's treatment of virtue and episteme in the Eudemian Ethics, in order to consider the legacy of the Socratic paradoxes after Plato.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 517264
650 4 $a Epistemology. $3 896969
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
653 $a Ancient philosophy
653 $a Episteme
653 $a Plato
653 $a Socratic paradox
653 $a Virtue
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0393
690 $a 0394
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b Philosophy. $3 2099185
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-10A.
790 $a 0054
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28415951