東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Clinical Decision Support: Design St...

Brunner, Julian William Maxwell.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Clinical Decision Support: Design Strategies and Quality Outcomes in Primary Care.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Clinical Decision Support: Design Strategies and Quality Outcomes in Primary Care./
作者:	Brunner, Julian William Maxwell.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	114 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-04, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-04B.
標題:	Health sciences. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10937394
ISBN:	9780438465275

Clinical Decision Support: Design Strategies and Quality Outcomes in Primary Care.
Brunner, Julian William Maxwell.

Clinical Decision Support: Design Strategies and Quality Outcomes in Primary Care. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 114 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-04, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

In medicine, computers are increasingly used not only to document patient care, but to support clinical decisions with relevant medical knowledge and patient information. This function is referred to as clinical decision support (CDS). Decades of scholarship have focused on evaluating CDS effectiveness, with promising but highly variable results. Having established that CDS can be useful, many have turned to more complex questions: what factors make CDS more effective and better-received by its users? How does CDS fit in with other strategies meant to ensure that clinical decisions are informed by current medical knowledge? When CDS works well, why and how does it do so? These are particularly important questions within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), which has a long history of using CDS, and has a massive scale that can enable CDS improvements to affect millions of patients. In this dissertation, I explore the use of CDS in VA primary care clinics. In study 1, I use VA-wide survey data to evaluate "user-centered design" strategies intended to make CDS easier to use and more effective. In study 2, I link that survey data with administrative records on colorectal cancer screening to examine CDS as one of several strategies for implementing evidence-based practices. In study 3, I use data from semi-structured interviews with primary care providers at VA clinics around Los Angeles to understand how CDS works for a specific clinical decision (prostate cancer screening). I find that "analysis of impact on performance improvement" is positively associated with perceived utility of CDS, but no association is evident for the other three user-centered design strategies examined. In assessing CDS efficacy alongside other strategies to support colorectal cancer screening, I find that neither CDS, nor any other implementation strategy examined, is associated with screening. In the qualitative study, I identify key factors in the effectiveness and acceptability of CDS for prostate cancer screening, including: workflow compatibility, the use of a trusted clinical guideline, and consultation with the intended users of CDS as part of its implementation. Conclusion: Judicious implementation and governance of CDS are important determinants of its usefulness.

ISBN: 9780438465275Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168359
Health sciences.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Clinical decision support

Clinical Decision Support: Design Strategies and Quality Outcomes in Primary Care.
LDR:03620nmm a2200397 4500 001 2270964
005 20201008063031.5
008 220629s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438465275
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10937394
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ucla:17315
035 $a AAI10937394
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Brunner, Julian William Maxwell. $3 3548358
245 1 0 $a Clinical Decision Support: Design Strategies and Quality Outcomes in Primary Care.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 114 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-04, Section: B.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Chuang, Emmeline.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a In medicine, computers are increasingly used not only to document patient care, but to support clinical decisions with relevant medical knowledge and patient information. This function is referred to as clinical decision support (CDS). Decades of scholarship have focused on evaluating CDS effectiveness, with promising but highly variable results. Having established that CDS can be useful, many have turned to more complex questions: what factors make CDS more effective and better-received by its users? How does CDS fit in with other strategies meant to ensure that clinical decisions are informed by current medical knowledge? When CDS works well, why and how does it do so? These are particularly important questions within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), which has a long history of using CDS, and has a massive scale that can enable CDS improvements to affect millions of patients. In this dissertation, I explore the use of CDS in VA primary care clinics. In study 1, I use VA-wide survey data to evaluate "user-centered design" strategies intended to make CDS easier to use and more effective. In study 2, I link that survey data with administrative records on colorectal cancer screening to examine CDS as one of several strategies for implementing evidence-based practices. In study 3, I use data from semi-structured interviews with primary care providers at VA clinics around Los Angeles to understand how CDS works for a specific clinical decision (prostate cancer screening). I find that "analysis of impact on performance improvement" is positively associated with perceived utility of CDS, but no association is evident for the other three user-centered design strategies examined. In assessing CDS efficacy alongside other strategies to support colorectal cancer screening, I find that neither CDS, nor any other implementation strategy examined, is associated with screening. In the qualitative study, I identify key factors in the effectiveness and acceptability of CDS for prostate cancer screening, including: workflow compatibility, the use of a trusted clinical guideline, and consultation with the intended users of CDS as part of its implementation. Conclusion: Judicious implementation and governance of CDS are important determinants of its usefulness.
590 $a School code: 0031.
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 3168359
650 4 $a Health care management. $3 2122906
653 $a Clinical decision support
653 $a Clinical informatics
653 $a Evidence-based practice
653 $a Health services research
653 $a Implementation science
653 $a User-centered design
690 $a 0566
690 $a 0769
710 2 $a University of California, Los Angeles. $b Health Policy and Management. $3 3188858
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-04B.
790 $a 0031
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10937394