東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Effects of collaboration and inquiry...

Jensen, Jamie Lee.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Effects of collaboration and inquiry on reasoning and achievement in biology.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Effects of collaboration and inquiry on reasoning and achievement in biology./
作者:	Jensen, Jamie Lee.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2008,
面頁冊數:	173 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 70-07, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International70-07A.
標題:	Community college education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3335255
ISBN:	9780549887751

Effects of collaboration and inquiry on reasoning and achievement in biology.
Jensen, Jamie Lee.

Effects of collaboration and inquiry on reasoning and achievement in biology. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2008 - 173 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 70-07, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2008.

The primary purpose of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of two collaborative grouping strategies and two instructional methods in terms of gains in reasoning ability and achievement in college biology. In order to do so, a quasi-experimental study was performed in which students were placed in one of four treatment conditions: heterogeneous grouping within inquiry instruction, homogeneous grouping within inquiry instruction, heterogeneous grouping within non-inquiry instruction, and homogeneous grouping within non-inquiry instruction. Students were placed in groups based on initial reasoning level. Reasoning levels and achievement gains were assessed at the end of the study. Results showed that within non-inquiry instruction, heterogeneous mean group scores were higher in both reasoning and achievement than homogeneous groups. In contrast, within inquiry instruction, homogeneous mean group scores were higher in both reasoning and achievement. Inquiry instruction, as a whole, significantly outperformed non-inquiry instruction in the development of reasoning ability. Within inquiry instruction, low-ability students had significantly greater reasoning gains when grouped homogeneously. These results support Piaget's developmental theory and contradict Vygotsky's developmental theory. These results also suggest that the success of one grouping strategy over another is highly dependent upon the nature of instruction, which may be a cause for such conflicting views on grouping strategies within the educational literature. In addition, inquiry instruction led to students having greater confidence in their reasoning ability as well as a more positive attitude toward collaboration. Instructional implications are discussed.

ISBN: 9780549887751Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122836
Community college education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Collaborative learning

Effects of collaboration and inquiry on reasoning and achievement in biology.
LDR:02899nmm a2200373 4500 001 2270888
005 20201007134033.5
008 220629s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549887751
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3335255
035 $a AAI3335255
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Jensen, Jamie Lee. $3 3548264
245 1 0 $a Effects of collaboration and inquiry on reasoning and achievement in biology.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2008
300 $a 173 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 70-07, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2008.
520 $a The primary purpose of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of two collaborative grouping strategies and two instructional methods in terms of gains in reasoning ability and achievement in college biology. In order to do so, a quasi-experimental study was performed in which students were placed in one of four treatment conditions: heterogeneous grouping within inquiry instruction, homogeneous grouping within inquiry instruction, heterogeneous grouping within non-inquiry instruction, and homogeneous grouping within non-inquiry instruction. Students were placed in groups based on initial reasoning level. Reasoning levels and achievement gains were assessed at the end of the study. Results showed that within non-inquiry instruction, heterogeneous mean group scores were higher in both reasoning and achievement than homogeneous groups. In contrast, within inquiry instruction, homogeneous mean group scores were higher in both reasoning and achievement. Inquiry instruction, as a whole, significantly outperformed non-inquiry instruction in the development of reasoning ability. Within inquiry instruction, low-ability students had significantly greater reasoning gains when grouped homogeneously. These results support Piaget's developmental theory and contradict Vygotsky's developmental theory. These results also suggest that the success of one grouping strategy over another is highly dependent upon the nature of instruction, which may be a cause for such conflicting views on grouping strategies within the educational literature. In addition, inquiry instruction led to students having greater confidence in their reasoning ability as well as a more positive attitude toward collaboration. Instructional implications are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Community college education. $3 2122836
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a Science education. $3 521340
650 4 $a Inquiry method. $3 3422461
650 4 $a Academic achievement. $3 541708
650 4 $a Biology. $3 522710
653 $a Collaborative learning
653 $a Inquiry
653 $a Piaget, Jean
653 $a Science education
653 $a Scientific reasoning skills
653 $a Vygotsky, Lev
690 $a 0275
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0714
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $3 1017445
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 70-07A.
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3335255