東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Thinking about teaching: does mentor...

Laverick, Vincent T.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Thinking about teaching: does mentoring a student teacher cause a cooperating teacher to be more reflective?

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Thinking about teaching: does mentoring a student teacher cause a cooperating teacher to be more reflective?/
Author:	Laverick, Vincent T.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
Description:	150 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 77-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International77-11A.
Subject:	School administration. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10109089
ISBN:	9781339723914

Thinking about teaching: does mentoring a student teacher cause a cooperating teacher to be more reflective?
Laverick, Vincent T.

Thinking about teaching: does mentoring a student teacher cause a cooperating teacher to be more reflective? - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 150 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 77-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--The University of Findlay, 2016.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

With increased standards and updated teacher evaluation procedures, in-service teachers have expressed concern about working with student teachers. Using Rodgers (2002) framework for reflection, two research questions were developed to measure the impact of student teachers on the reflective practices of cooperating teachers: Does a student teacher cause a cooperating teacher to be more reflective? and Does a student teacher cause the cooperating teacher to have a greater amount of reflective moments? Data from five teachers who completed surveys and 4 who completed interviews were used to answer the research questions in a qualitative study. The results indicated an inconclusive result in addressing Does a student teacher cause a cooperating teacher to be more reflective? In addition, the second question, Does a student teacher cause the cooperating teacher to have a greater amount of reflective moments? , was answered with a negative response. However, there were two unintended findings. The findings showed in-service teachers, who participated in the study, do not understand the meaning and process of reflection. Also, the in-service teachers repeatedly referred to metacognitive practices rather than reflective practices while evaluating their personal teaching. An argument was established to educate in-service teachers on the effective practice and process of reflection for improved teacher performance. Also, a link was made between metacognition and reflection and how the two processes used in tandem can inform the other.

ISBN: 9781339723914Subjects--Topical Terms:

3172164
School administration.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Cooperating teacher

Thinking about teaching: does mentoring a student teacher cause a cooperating teacher to be more reflective?
LDR:02904nmm a2200409 4500 001 2266340
005 20200612094425.5
008 220629s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339723914
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10109089
035 $a (MiAaPQ)OhioLINK:findlay1460807098
035 $a AAI10109089
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Laverick, Vincent T. $3 3543533
245 1 0 $a Thinking about teaching: does mentoring a student teacher cause a cooperating teacher to be more reflective?
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 150 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 77-11, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Denecker, Christine.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--The University of Findlay, 2016.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a With increased standards and updated teacher evaluation procedures, in-service teachers have expressed concern about working with student teachers. Using Rodgers (2002) framework for reflection, two research questions were developed to measure the impact of student teachers on the reflective practices of cooperating teachers: Does a student teacher cause a cooperating teacher to be more reflective? and Does a student teacher cause the cooperating teacher to have a greater amount of reflective moments? Data from five teachers who completed surveys and 4 who completed interviews were used to answer the research questions in a qualitative study. The results indicated an inconclusive result in addressing Does a student teacher cause a cooperating teacher to be more reflective? In addition, the second question, Does a student teacher cause the cooperating teacher to have a greater amount of reflective moments? , was answered with a negative response. However, there were two unintended findings. The findings showed in-service teachers, who participated in the study, do not understand the meaning and process of reflection. Also, the in-service teachers repeatedly referred to metacognitive practices rather than reflective practices while evaluating their personal teaching. An argument was established to educate in-service teachers on the effective practice and process of reflection for improved teacher performance. Also, a link was made between metacognition and reflection and how the two processes used in tandem can inform the other.
590 $a School code: 1610.
650 4 $a School administration. $3 3172164
650 4 $a Teacher education. $3 3172312
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
653 $a Cooperating teacher
653 $a Inservice teachers
653 $a Metacognition
653 $a Pre-service teachers
653 $a Reflection
653 $a Student teacher
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0530
690 $a 0727
710 2 $a The University of Findlay. $b Education. $3 3287669
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 77-11A.
790 $a 1610
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10109089