東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Who's There? Boundaries, Entitativit...

Ernst, Brittany.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Who's There? Boundaries, Entitativity, and Copresence in an Online Discussion Forum.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Who's There? Boundaries, Entitativity, and Copresence in an Online Discussion Forum./
Author:	Ernst, Brittany.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
Description:	61 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International80-07.
Subject:	Behavioral psychology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10982132
ISBN:	9780438783041

Who's There? Boundaries, Entitativity, and Copresence in an Online Discussion Forum.
Ernst, Brittany.

Who's There? Boundaries, Entitativity, and Copresence in an Online Discussion Forum. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 61 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07.

Thesis (M.A.)--The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

In this study, social presence theory is proposed as an explanation for the relationship between permeability of boundaries and entitativity in online groups. This claim is tested in an experiment in which group boundaries are manipulated in a fictitious online discussion forum. Structural equation modeling and multiple group analysis were used to test the proposed model and determine whether results were different across the two experimental groups. Results indicate that although participants' perceptions of boundaries were not different across the groups, boundaries predicts both social presence and entitativity. Further, boundaries may be better conceptualized as two separate constructs (weak and strong), and these constructs have differing, and unexpected relationships with entitativity and copresence. However, when additional established antecedents of entitativity are included in the model, boundaries no longer significantly predict entitativity. Implications of studying boundaries and copresence in online and takeaways for practitioners are discussed.

ISBN: 9780438783041Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122788
Behavioral psychology.

Who's There? Boundaries, Entitativity, and Copresence in an Online Discussion Forum.
LDR:02186nmm a2200349 4500 001 2263881
005 20200331094359.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438783041
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10982132
035 $a (MiAaPQ)uncc:11936
035 $a AAI10982132
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ernst, Brittany. $3 3540972
245 1 0 $a Who's There? Boundaries, Entitativity, and Copresence in an Online Discussion Forum.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 61 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Blanchard, Anita.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a In this study, social presence theory is proposed as an explanation for the relationship between permeability of boundaries and entitativity in online groups. This claim is tested in an experiment in which group boundaries are manipulated in a fictitious online discussion forum. Structural equation modeling and multiple group analysis were used to test the proposed model and determine whether results were different across the two experimental groups. Results indicate that although participants' perceptions of boundaries were not different across the groups, boundaries predicts both social presence and entitativity. Further, boundaries may be better conceptualized as two separate constructs (weak and strong), and these constructs have differing, and unexpected relationships with entitativity and copresence. However, when additional established antecedents of entitativity are included in the model, boundaries no longer significantly predict entitativity. Implications of studying boundaries and copresence in online and takeaways for practitioners are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0694.
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Personality psychology. $3 2144789
650 4 $a Web Studies. $3 1026830
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0625
690 $a 0646
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Charlotte. $b Psychology. $3 3428581
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 80-07.
790 $a 0694
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10982132