東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ subject: ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Chance, merit, and economic inequali...

Dwyer, Joseph de la Torre.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Chance, merit, and economic inequality = rethinking distributive justice and the principle of desert /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Chance, merit, and economic inequality/ by Joseph de la Torre Dwyer.
Reminder of title:	rethinking distributive justice and the principle of desert /
Author:	Dwyer, Joseph de la Torre.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2020.,
Description:	xvii, 248 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
[NT 15003449]:	1. Introduction -- 2. The Die is Cast: Chance, Merit, and Inequality -- 3. Autonomy and Desert -- 4. Equal Opportunity and Just Deserts: Better Late than Before -- 5. Efficiency and Just Deserts: Economists' Big Trade-Off -- 6. Liberty and Just Deserts: Slaves, Dynasties, and Moral Agents -- 7. Economy and Desert -- 8. Measure for Merit -- 9. The Individual Moral Agent -- 10. The Natural Lottery Alone -- 11. Just Deserts -- 12. Just Deserts Outcomes and Aggregate Analysis -- 13. The Just Deserts Economy -- 14. Conclusion.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Distributive justice. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21126-4
ISBN:	9783030211264

Chance, merit, and economic inequality = rethinking distributive justice and the principle of desert /
Dwyer, Joseph de la Torre.

Chance, merit, and economic inequalityrethinking distributive justice and the principle of desert /[electronic resource] :by Joseph de la Torre Dwyer. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020. - xvii, 248 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

1. Introduction -- 2. The Die is Cast: Chance, Merit, and Inequality -- 3. Autonomy and Desert -- 4. Equal Opportunity and Just Deserts: Better Late than Before -- 5. Efficiency and Just Deserts: Economists' Big Trade-Off -- 6. Liberty and Just Deserts: Slaves, Dynasties, and Moral Agents -- 7. Economy and Desert -- 8. Measure for Merit -- 9. The Individual Moral Agent -- 10. The Natural Lottery Alone -- 11. Just Deserts -- 12. Just Deserts Outcomes and Aggregate Analysis -- 13. The Just Deserts Economy -- 14. Conclusion.

This book develops a novel approach to distributive justice by building a theory based on a concept of desert. As a work of applied political theory, it presents a simple but powerful theoretical argument and a detailed proposal to eliminate unmerited inequality, poverty, and economic immobility, speaking to the underlying moral principles of both progressives who already support egalitarian measures and also conservatives who have previously rejected egalitarianism on the grounds of individual freedom, personal responsibility, hard work, or economic efficiency. By using an agnostic, flexible, data-driven approach to isolate luck and ultimately measure desert, this proposal makes equal opportunity initiatives both more accurate and effective as it adapts to a changing economy. It grants to each individual the freedom to genuinely choose their place in the distribution. It provides two policy variations that are perfectly economically efficient, and two others that are conditionally so. It straightforwardly aligns outcomes with widely shared, fundamental moral intuitions. Lastly, it demonstrates much of the above by modeling four policy variations using 40 years of survey data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics.

ISBN: 9783030211264

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-21126-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

528289
Distributive justice.

LC Class. No.: HB523

Dewey Class. No.: 339.2

Chance, merit, and economic inequality = rethinking distributive justice and the principle of desert /
LDR:02793nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 2214017
003 DE-He213
005 20200225143602.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 201118s2020 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030211264 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030211257 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-21126-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-21126-4
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a HB523
072 7 $a HPS $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI019000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTS $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 339.2 $2 23
090 $a HB523 $b .D993 2020
100 1 $a Dwyer, Joseph de la Torre. $3 3444115
245 1 0 $a Chance, merit, and economic inequality $h [electronic resource] : $b rethinking distributive justice and the principle of desert / $c by Joseph de la Torre Dwyer.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2020.
300 $a xvii, 248 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a 1. Introduction -- 2. The Die is Cast: Chance, Merit, and Inequality -- 3. Autonomy and Desert -- 4. Equal Opportunity and Just Deserts: Better Late than Before -- 5. Efficiency and Just Deserts: Economists' Big Trade-Off -- 6. Liberty and Just Deserts: Slaves, Dynasties, and Moral Agents -- 7. Economy and Desert -- 8. Measure for Merit -- 9. The Individual Moral Agent -- 10. The Natural Lottery Alone -- 11. Just Deserts -- 12. Just Deserts Outcomes and Aggregate Analysis -- 13. The Just Deserts Economy -- 14. Conclusion.
520 $a This book develops a novel approach to distributive justice by building a theory based on a concept of desert. As a work of applied political theory, it presents a simple but powerful theoretical argument and a detailed proposal to eliminate unmerited inequality, poverty, and economic immobility, speaking to the underlying moral principles of both progressives who already support egalitarian measures and also conservatives who have previously rejected egalitarianism on the grounds of individual freedom, personal responsibility, hard work, or economic efficiency. By using an agnostic, flexible, data-driven approach to isolate luck and ultimately measure desert, this proposal makes equal opportunity initiatives both more accurate and effective as it adapts to a changing economy. It grants to each individual the freedom to genuinely choose their place in the distribution. It provides two policy variations that are perfectly economically efficient, and two others that are conditionally so. It straightforwardly aligns outcomes with widely shared, fundamental moral intuitions. Lastly, it demonstrates much of the above by modeling four policy variations using 40 years of survey data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics.
650 0 $a Distributive justice. $3 528289
650 0 $a Income distribution. $3 560690
650 0 $a Merit (Ethics) $3 892042
650 1 4 $a Political Philosophy. $3 891262
650 2 4 $a Political Theory. $3 1567962
650 2 4 $a Social Structure, Social Inequality. $3 1567121
650 2 4 $a Public Policy. $3 736292
650 2 4 $a Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics. $3 2162289
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21126-4
950 $a Political Science and International Studies (Springer-41174)