東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Divorce, Banking, and War in Islam: ...

Lewis, Stephen George.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Divorce, Banking, and War in Islam: Evaluating the Reliability and Coverage of Common World Religion Research Tools.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Divorce, Banking, and War in Islam: Evaluating the Reliability and Coverage of Common World Religion Research Tools./
Author:	Lewis, Stephen George.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
Description:	289 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-06, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-06A.
Subject:	Ethics. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10982680
ISBN:	9780438705548

Divorce, Banking, and War in Islam: Evaluating the Reliability and Coverage of Common World Religion Research Tools.
Lewis, Stephen George.

Divorce, Banking, and War in Islam: Evaluating the Reliability and Coverage of Common World Religion Research Tools. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 289 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-06, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2018.

This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.

This dissertation is a study of Google's ability to function as an expert in the field of world religions. Employing three case studies within the area of Islamic ethics, this study determines Google's ability to function as an expert compared to a leading research tool in the humanities, JSTOR. The study incorporates a literature survey of the three areas of Islamic ethics (divorce, banking, and war) to serve as a baseline for the evaluation of Google and JSTOR search results. The study utilizes a two-level comparison. Chapter 1 outlines the work and sets the stage for why the work is important. The chapter also outlines the methodology of the work. Chapter 2 delves more deeply into the methodology by outlining the study upon which the first-level comparison is based. The chapter also describes how the current study expands and adapts that methodology for its purposes. Chapters 3 and 4 survey literature related to the three areas of Islamic ethics: the rights of women in divorce, mudaraba banking, and just war. Chapter 3 surveys primary sources, while Chapter 4 surveys secondary literature. The literature survey provides a baseline the study uses to analyze the reliability and coverage of Google and JSTOR. Chapter 5 contains the results of the first-level comparison. The chapter compares Google and JSTOR search results to determine the relevance and quality of the results. Chapter 6 conducts the second-level comparison. This chapter compares and analyzes the content of the relevant results. The contents of the search results are first compiled. Then, a point-by-point comparison is conducted to determine the reliability and coverage of Google to function as an expert in the field of world religions. In short, Google functions just as well as JSTOR as an expert in the field of world religions. Furthermore, Google answers questions with relevant and reliable content, while also demonstrating coverage in the same manner as the literature survey. Chapter 7 is a conclusion. The chapter reviews the findings of the study, notes the significance of the study, and provides thoughts on further study.

ISBN: 9780438705548Subjects--Topical Terms:

517264
Ethics.

Divorce, Banking, and War in Islam: Evaluating the Reliability and Coverage of Common World Religion Research Tools.
LDR:03371nmm a2200349 4500 001 2209648
005 20191104073757.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438705548
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10982680
035 $a (MiAaPQ)sbts:10497
035 $a AAI10982680
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lewis, Stephen George. $3 3436745
245 1 0 $a Divorce, Banking, and War in Islam: Evaluating the Reliability and Coverage of Common World Religion Research Tools.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 289 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-06, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Martin, George H.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This dissertation is a study of Google's ability to function as an expert in the field of world religions. Employing three case studies within the area of Islamic ethics, this study determines Google's ability to function as an expert compared to a leading research tool in the humanities, JSTOR. The study incorporates a literature survey of the three areas of Islamic ethics (divorce, banking, and war) to serve as a baseline for the evaluation of Google and JSTOR search results. The study utilizes a two-level comparison. Chapter 1 outlines the work and sets the stage for why the work is important. The chapter also outlines the methodology of the work. Chapter 2 delves more deeply into the methodology by outlining the study upon which the first-level comparison is based. The chapter also describes how the current study expands and adapts that methodology for its purposes. Chapters 3 and 4 survey literature related to the three areas of Islamic ethics: the rights of women in divorce, mudaraba banking, and just war. Chapter 3 surveys primary sources, while Chapter 4 surveys secondary literature. The literature survey provides a baseline the study uses to analyze the reliability and coverage of Google and JSTOR. Chapter 5 contains the results of the first-level comparison. The chapter compares Google and JSTOR search results to determine the relevance and quality of the results. Chapter 6 conducts the second-level comparison. This chapter compares and analyzes the content of the relevant results. The contents of the search results are first compiled. Then, a point-by-point comparison is conducted to determine the reliability and coverage of Google to function as an expert in the field of world religions. In short, Google functions just as well as JSTOR as an expert in the field of world religions. Furthermore, Google answers questions with relevant and reliable content, while also demonstrating coverage in the same manner as the literature survey. Chapter 7 is a conclusion. The chapter reviews the findings of the study, notes the significance of the study, and provides thoughts on further study.
590 $a School code: 0207.
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 517264
650 4 $a Islamic Studies. $3 1669733
650 4 $a Information science. $3 554358
690 $a 0394
690 $a 0512
690 $a 0723
710 2 $a The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. $b Missions and Evangelism. $3 2105484
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-06A.
790 $a 0207
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10982680