東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Energy-positive methods of wastewate...

Gregoire, Kyla.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Energy-positive methods of wastewater treatment - An examination of anaerobic digestion & bioelectrochemical technology.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Energy-positive methods of wastewater treatment - An examination of anaerobic digestion & bioelectrochemical technology./
作者:	Gregoire, Kyla.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2013,
面頁冊數:	253 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 75-09, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International75-09B.
標題:	Civil engineering. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3611355
ISBN:	9781303720000

Energy-positive methods of wastewater treatment - An examination of anaerobic digestion & bioelectrochemical technology.
Gregoire, Kyla.

Energy-positive methods of wastewater treatment - An examination of anaerobic digestion & bioelectrochemical technology. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2013 - 253 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 75-09, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2013.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

The results presented here demonstrate plausibility of a hybrid Anaerobic Digester-Microbial Fuel Cell (AD-MFC) system for anaerobic primary (AD) and secondary (MFC) treatment and resource recovery from high-strength wastewater. We empirically determine the treatment efficiencies and energy densities achieved by the AD and MFC processes, both separately and when integrated as primary and secondary unit operations. On the basis of current production, undigested wastewater yielded an stable anodic current of 131 A/m3 when continuously fed to triplicate MFCs (chronoamperometry, Ean, -0.200V vs. Ag/AgCl). Substrate limitations in digested sludge reduced anodic current--36 A/m3, 17 A/m3, and 9 A/m3 were achieved from 6d, 13d, and 21d digestate, respectively. Cathodic limitations severely limited power/energy production by the MFC, with maximum power output of 11 W/m3 (69 mW/m2). Presumably, this was due to mass transport of oxygen reduction intermediates. When AD and MFC processes are de-coupled (i.e. each fed with undigested wastewater), the energy realized from AD (as biogas) was, on average, 29.6 kJ per m3 wastewater treated (8.2 Wh/m3), whereas the MFC produced, on average, 2.1 kJ per m3 wastewater treated (0.58 Wh/m3). On the basis of COD removal, AD separately generated 9,110 kJ per kg COD removed (2,530 Wh/kg COD) whereas MFC separately generated 0.18 kJ per kg COD removed (0.05 Wh/kg COD). When combined as primary and secondary unit processes with a 6-d digestion period (reaction period which yielded the highest net energy production), the energy output from AD (as biogas) was 23.9 kJ per m3 wastewater; the energy output from MFC (as electrical power) was 2.1 kJ per m3 wastewater. MFC treatment rates exceeded 90% COD removal, 80% VS removal and 80% TS removal, likely owing to the upflow, baffled reactor design that maximized interaction between wastewater and the anodic biofilm. Results indicate an inverse logarithmic relationship between digester retention time and subsequent MFC current production, i.e. maximal MFC current production is achieved with undigested waste, and an inverse linear relationship between digester retention time and subsequent COD/VS removal in MFCs. Breakthroughs must be made to address cathodic limitations of MFCs, before scaling is practically or economically viable.

ISBN: 9781303720000Subjects--Topical Terms:

860360
Civil engineering.

Energy-positive methods of wastewater treatment - An examination of anaerobic digestion & bioelectrochemical technology.
LDR:03586nmm a2200349 4500 001 2208705
005 20191028072737.5
008 201008s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303720000
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3611355
035 $a (MiAaPQ)umd:14674
035 $a AAI3611355
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Gregoire, Kyla. $3 3435752
245 1 0 $a Energy-positive methods of wastewater treatment - An examination of anaerobic digestion & bioelectrochemical technology.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2013
300 $a 253 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 75-09, Section: B.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Tender, Leonard;Torrents, Alba.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2013.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The results presented here demonstrate plausibility of a hybrid Anaerobic Digester-Microbial Fuel Cell (AD-MFC) system for anaerobic primary (AD) and secondary (MFC) treatment and resource recovery from high-strength wastewater. We empirically determine the treatment efficiencies and energy densities achieved by the AD and MFC processes, both separately and when integrated as primary and secondary unit operations. On the basis of current production, undigested wastewater yielded an stable anodic current of 131 A/m3 when continuously fed to triplicate MFCs (chronoamperometry, Ean, -0.200V vs. Ag/AgCl). Substrate limitations in digested sludge reduced anodic current--36 A/m3, 17 A/m3, and 9 A/m3 were achieved from 6d, 13d, and 21d digestate, respectively. Cathodic limitations severely limited power/energy production by the MFC, with maximum power output of 11 W/m3 (69 mW/m2). Presumably, this was due to mass transport of oxygen reduction intermediates. When AD and MFC processes are de-coupled (i.e. each fed with undigested wastewater), the energy realized from AD (as biogas) was, on average, 29.6 kJ per m3 wastewater treated (8.2 Wh/m3), whereas the MFC produced, on average, 2.1 kJ per m3 wastewater treated (0.58 Wh/m3). On the basis of COD removal, AD separately generated 9,110 kJ per kg COD removed (2,530 Wh/kg COD) whereas MFC separately generated 0.18 kJ per kg COD removed (0.05 Wh/kg COD). When combined as primary and secondary unit processes with a 6-d digestion period (reaction period which yielded the highest net energy production), the energy output from AD (as biogas) was 23.9 kJ per m3 wastewater; the energy output from MFC (as electrical power) was 2.1 kJ per m3 wastewater. MFC treatment rates exceeded 90% COD removal, 80% VS removal and 80% TS removal, likely owing to the upflow, baffled reactor design that maximized interaction between wastewater and the anodic biofilm. Results indicate an inverse logarithmic relationship between digester retention time and subsequent MFC current production, i.e. maximal MFC current production is achieved with undigested waste, and an inverse linear relationship between digester retention time and subsequent COD/VS removal in MFCs. Breakthroughs must be made to address cathodic limitations of MFCs, before scaling is practically or economically viable.
590 $a School code: 0117.
650 4 $a Civil engineering. $3 860360
650 4 $a Water Resource Management. $3 1669219
650 4 $a Environmental engineering. $3 548583
690 $a 0543
690 $a 0595
690 $a 0775
710 2 $a University of Maryland, College Park. $b Civil Engineering. $3 1025664
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 75-09B.
790 $a 0117
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3611355