東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The Architecture of Keeping Animals:...

McCollum, Victoria.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Architecture of Keeping Animals: Preservation Responses to Changing Animal Welfare Ideals in Mid-sized American Zoos.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Architecture of Keeping Animals: Preservation Responses to Changing Animal Welfare Ideals in Mid-sized American Zoos./
Author:	McCollum, Victoria.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
Description:	193 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International79-12.
Subject:	American history. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10810284
ISBN:	9780438055513

The Architecture of Keeping Animals: Preservation Responses to Changing Animal Welfare Ideals in Mid-sized American Zoos.
McCollum, Victoria.

The Architecture of Keeping Animals: Preservation Responses to Changing Animal Welfare Ideals in Mid-sized American Zoos. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 193 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12.

Thesis (M.S.H.P.)--Clemson University, 2018.

This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.

Beginning in the mid-20th century, most of America's Zoos began to re-evaluate the spaces which housed their living creatures. As advances in science and technology brought forward new information on animal welfare and care, zoos were soon faced with choices on the treatment of their current building stock. A range of preservation treatments emerged, from abandonment to demolition/new construction. This thesis examines the range of preservation treatments that took place in zoo buildings built prior to 1950 at the Lincoln Park Zoo (Chicago, IL), the Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Gardens (Cincinnati, OH), the Toledo Zoo and Aquarium (Toledo, OH) and the Philadelphia Zoo (Philadelphia, PA). Revealing the building treatment response of each zoo to the continued changes in animal welfare unveiled that of the five zoos studied, renovation was the most common treatment for each zoo, followed by adaptive reuse. Thus, all zoos chose to simply renovate their buildings to better accommodate animals or adapt buildings for new zoo uses. A case study surveying the changes in each zoos Lion Houses as a response to the changing body of knowledge surrounding keeping large cats found that zoos were making timely changes regarding standards of felid care. While changes were timely, they varied greatly in quality. This represents that responses were largely to the unknowns in research rather than the knowns. Today there is a significant amount of historic building stock still extant in mid sized urban zoos. This information facilitated the discussion of recommendations for future uses of these buildings as animal welfare standards continue to change.

ISBN: 9780438055513Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122692
American history.

The Architecture of Keeping Animals: Preservation Responses to Changing Animal Welfare Ideals in Mid-sized American Zoos.
LDR:02829nmm a2200337 4500 001 2208671
005 20191028072731.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438055513
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10810284
035 $a (MiAaPQ)clemson:14828
035 $a AAI10810284
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a McCollum, Victoria. $3 3435715
245 1 4 $a The Architecture of Keeping Animals: Preservation Responses to Changing Animal Welfare Ideals in Mid-sized American Zoos.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 193 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Leifeste, Amalia.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.H.P.)--Clemson University, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Beginning in the mid-20th century, most of America's Zoos began to re-evaluate the spaces which housed their living creatures. As advances in science and technology brought forward new information on animal welfare and care, zoos were soon faced with choices on the treatment of their current building stock. A range of preservation treatments emerged, from abandonment to demolition/new construction. This thesis examines the range of preservation treatments that took place in zoo buildings built prior to 1950 at the Lincoln Park Zoo (Chicago, IL), the Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Gardens (Cincinnati, OH), the Toledo Zoo and Aquarium (Toledo, OH) and the Philadelphia Zoo (Philadelphia, PA). Revealing the building treatment response of each zoo to the continued changes in animal welfare unveiled that of the five zoos studied, renovation was the most common treatment for each zoo, followed by adaptive reuse. Thus, all zoos chose to simply renovate their buildings to better accommodate animals or adapt buildings for new zoo uses. A case study surveying the changes in each zoos Lion Houses as a response to the changing body of knowledge surrounding keeping large cats found that zoos were making timely changes regarding standards of felid care. While changes were timely, they varied greatly in quality. This represents that responses were largely to the unknowns in research rather than the knowns. Today there is a significant amount of historic building stock still extant in mid sized urban zoos. This information facilitated the discussion of recommendations for future uses of these buildings as animal welfare standards continue to change.
590 $a School code: 0050.
650 4 $a American history. $3 2122692
650 4 $a Architecture. $3 523581
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0729
710 2 $a Clemson University. $b The College of Architecture, Arts and Humanities. $3 1023687
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 79-12.
790 $a 0050
791 $a M.S.H.P.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10810284