東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

A Plea for Justice: Racial Bias in P...

Mizel, Matthew Lawrence.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Plea for Justice: Racial Bias in Pretrial Decision Making.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	A Plea for Justice: Racial Bias in Pretrial Decision Making./
Author:	Mizel, Matthew Lawrence.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
Description:	167 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International79-12A.
Subject:	Law. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10825268
ISBN:	9780438010802

A Plea for Justice: Racial Bias in Pretrial Decision Making.
Mizel, Matthew Lawrence.

A Plea for Justice: Racial Bias in Pretrial Decision Making. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 167 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

African American defendants are more likely than Whites to be charged punitively by prosecutors at arraignment, detained pretrial, and sentenced harshly via plea bargain. These disparities contribute to mass incarceration, because 95% of cases adjudicate by plea bargain rather than a jury trial. Prior research has found that implicit racial bias (unconscious attitudes and stereotypes about race) and dehumanization bias (thinking of others as less human) are associated with racial disparities in areas of the justice system outside of pretrial decision making. This study poses the following questions: (1) Are implicit racial bias, explicit racial bias, implicit dehumanization bias, and/or explicit dehumanization bias associated with pretrial decision making (for each of initial charge, bail, target plea sentence, minimum acceptable plea sentence, and charge reduction)? (2) What are the relative influences of implicit racial bias, explicit racial bias, implicit dehumanization bias, and explicit dehumanization bias? A total of 148 students from the UCLA School of Law read a fictional criminal case vignette and then made pretrial decisions in the role of prosecutor. The race of the defendant was randomly assigned to be either African American or White while all other aspects of the vignette were held constant. Higher anti-African American/pro-White implicit dehumanization bias was associated with a less punitive initial robbery charge for the White defendant. Greater anti-African American/pro-White implicit racial bias was associated with three outcomes for the White defendant in a direction contrary to implicit bias theory: setting a higher bail amount, targeting a longer prison sentence for the plea bargain, and being less likely to offer a charge reduction. In supplemental analyses, participants who believed in the biological basis of race were less likely to charge the White defendant more punitively. The results suggest that implicit dehumanization bias and implicit racial bias influence pretrial decision making but that only implicit dehumanization bias contributes to racial disparity. Future research could test these results with working prosecutors and defense attorneys to expand the generalizability of the findings.

ISBN: 9780438010802Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

A Plea for Justice: Racial Bias in Pretrial Decision Making.
LDR:03357nmm a2200349 4500 001 2206654
005 20190906082711.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438010802
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10825268
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ucla:16777
035 $a AAI10825268
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Mizel, Matthew Lawrence. $3 3433572
245 1 0 $a A Plea for Justice: Racial Bias in Pretrial Decision Making.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 167 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Abrams, Laura S.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a African American defendants are more likely than Whites to be charged punitively by prosecutors at arraignment, detained pretrial, and sentenced harshly via plea bargain. These disparities contribute to mass incarceration, because 95% of cases adjudicate by plea bargain rather than a jury trial. Prior research has found that implicit racial bias (unconscious attitudes and stereotypes about race) and dehumanization bias (thinking of others as less human) are associated with racial disparities in areas of the justice system outside of pretrial decision making. This study poses the following questions: (1) Are implicit racial bias, explicit racial bias, implicit dehumanization bias, and/or explicit dehumanization bias associated with pretrial decision making (for each of initial charge, bail, target plea sentence, minimum acceptable plea sentence, and charge reduction)? (2) What are the relative influences of implicit racial bias, explicit racial bias, implicit dehumanization bias, and explicit dehumanization bias? A total of 148 students from the UCLA School of Law read a fictional criminal case vignette and then made pretrial decisions in the role of prosecutor. The race of the defendant was randomly assigned to be either African American or White while all other aspects of the vignette were held constant. Higher anti-African American/pro-White implicit dehumanization bias was associated with a less punitive initial robbery charge for the White defendant. Greater anti-African American/pro-White implicit racial bias was associated with three outcomes for the White defendant in a direction contrary to implicit bias theory: setting a higher bail amount, targeting a longer prison sentence for the plea bargain, and being less likely to offer a charge reduction. In supplemental analyses, participants who believed in the biological basis of race were less likely to charge the White defendant more punitively. The results suggest that implicit dehumanization bias and implicit racial bias influence pretrial decision making but that only implicit dehumanization bias contributes to racial disparity. Future research could test these results with working prosecutors and defense attorneys to expand the generalizability of the findings.
590 $a School code: 0031.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Social work. $3 644197
650 4 $a Ethnic studies. $2 bicssc $3 1556779
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0452
690 $a 0631
710 2 $a University of California, Los Angeles. $b Social Welfare 0864. $3 3171157
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 79-12A.
790 $a 0031
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10825268