東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Road to Improving Informational ...

Ahrens, Christine L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Road to Improving Informational Text Comprehension in the Upper Elementary Grades.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Road to Improving Informational Text Comprehension in the Upper Elementary Grades./
作者:	Ahrens, Christine L.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	227 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-04A(E).
標題:	Education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10640377
ISBN:	9780355493320

The Road to Improving Informational Text Comprehension in the Upper Elementary Grades.
Ahrens, Christine L.

The Road to Improving Informational Text Comprehension in the Upper Elementary Grades. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 227 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Cardinal Stritch University, 2017.

This study addresses how the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) have been implemented in the Sheboygan Area School District using the Curriculum Companion Reading Framework. With the CCSS, there is an increase of 50% informational text in the elementary grades (CCSSO, 2010). The research questions are: How does teaching the Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts and Literacy's comprehension of overall reading and informational text, using the Curriculum Companion Reading Framework compare to traditional teaching methods, as assessed by Measure of Academic Progress tests in the upper elementary grades? As well as: How well do teachers know the Curriculum Companion Reading Framework? Are teachers using the framework? What are some reasons why teachers would not use CCRF?

ISBN: 9780355493320Subjects--Topical Terms:

516579
Education.

The Road to Improving Informational Text Comprehension in the Upper Elementary Grades.
LDR:03087nmm a2200337 4500 001 2204239
005 20190709084845.5
008 201008s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355493320
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10640377
035 $a (MiAaPQ)stritch:10185
035 $a AAI10640377
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ahrens, Christine L. $3 3431074
245 1 4 $a The Road to Improving Informational Text Comprehension in the Upper Elementary Grades.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 227 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Janice E. Jones.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Cardinal Stritch University, 2017.
520 $a This study addresses how the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) have been implemented in the Sheboygan Area School District using the Curriculum Companion Reading Framework. With the CCSS, there is an increase of 50% informational text in the elementary grades (CCSSO, 2010). The research questions are: How does teaching the Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts and Literacy's comprehension of overall reading and informational text, using the Curriculum Companion Reading Framework compare to traditional teaching methods, as assessed by Measure of Academic Progress tests in the upper elementary grades? As well as: How well do teachers know the Curriculum Companion Reading Framework? Are teachers using the framework? What are some reasons why teachers would not use CCRF?
520 $a This research is a quasi-experimental design of quantitatively examining Measure of Academic (MAP) test results specific to the informational text strand. Based on 2011 NWEA Measure of Academic Progress Normative Data for reading, 10,604 scores were analyzed. The second part of the research study was based on an archived teacher survey (n=89) about teachers' beliefs on the effectiveness and usage of the Curriculum Companion Reading Framework.
520 $a The findings show that all student groups increased in overall reading as well the strand of informational text. A t-test showed all three grade levels were significantly different from the 2011 NWEA MAP Normative Overall Reading data for the fall 2012 to spring 2013 school year. The ANOVA tests show no statistically significant differences between the experimental groups receiving the Curriculum Companion Reading Framework and those receiving traditional reading instruction. The researcher believes that teacher experience had a larger impact on growth than the Curriculum Companion Reading Framework. This is based on the fact that the median and mode for teachers' years of experience was >25 years. Teacher confidence in teaching using this new framework has declined significantly compared to prior reading instruction.
590 $a School code: 1065.
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0535
690 $a 0288
710 2 $a Cardinal Stritch University. $b Doctoral Leadership Studies. $3 2098341
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-04A(E).
790 $a 1065
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10640377