東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Divergent Trajectories of an Ide...

Rost, Caterina.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Divergent Trajectories of an Idea: Sustainable Development in Germany and the United States.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Divergent Trajectories of an Idea: Sustainable Development in Germany and the United States./
作者:	Rost, Caterina.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	382 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-02A(E).
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10622169
ISBN:	9780355356281

The Divergent Trajectories of an Idea: Sustainable Development in Germany and the United States.
Rost, Caterina.

The Divergent Trajectories of an Idea: Sustainable Development in Germany and the United States. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 382 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2017.

The idea of sustainable development underlies a policy regime in Germany but has not provided the basis for similar policy in the United States. Even though polls suggest that there is widespread support for environmental spending in both the US and Germany, only Germany has a well-developed policy regime around sustainable development. In the US, however, the idea as well as the interests and institutions surrounding sustainable development have not been able to capture policymaking at the national level, despite multiple attempts by presidents (specifically Presidents Carter & Clinton). This dissertation is seeking to answer the question, why has sustainable development taken such a different trajectory in US national policymaking than it has in German national policymaking? More broadly speaking, how do ideas gain traction in policymaking? I argue that these two cases allow us to draw several broader lessons about the tractability of ideas. These lessons concern ideational framing and concurrence, the impact of the political system on the strength of the interest opposition, the capabilities and limitations of the institutional structure, as well as the impact of contextual factors. Ultimately, the evidence points to the largest lesson being the importance of the interplay of ideas, interests, institutions, and ideology.

ISBN: 9780355356281Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.

The Divergent Trajectories of an Idea: Sustainable Development in Germany and the United States.
LDR:02337nmm a2200313 4500 001 2157215
005 20180531091028.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355356281
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10622169
035 $a (MiAaPQ)washington:17848
035 $a AAI10622169
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Rost, Caterina. $3 3345013
245 1 4 $a The Divergent Trajectories of an Idea: Sustainable Development in Germany and the United States.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 382 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Mark A. Smith.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2017.
520 $a The idea of sustainable development underlies a policy regime in Germany but has not provided the basis for similar policy in the United States. Even though polls suggest that there is widespread support for environmental spending in both the US and Germany, only Germany has a well-developed policy regime around sustainable development. In the US, however, the idea as well as the interests and institutions surrounding sustainable development have not been able to capture policymaking at the national level, despite multiple attempts by presidents (specifically Presidents Carter & Clinton). This dissertation is seeking to answer the question, why has sustainable development taken such a different trajectory in US national policymaking than it has in German national policymaking? More broadly speaking, how do ideas gain traction in policymaking? I argue that these two cases allow us to draw several broader lessons about the tractability of ideas. These lessons concern ideational framing and concurrence, the impact of the political system on the strength of the interest opposition, the capabilities and limitations of the institutional structure, as well as the impact of contextual factors. Ultimately, the evidence points to the largest lesson being the importance of the interplay of ideas, interests, institutions, and ideology.
590 $a School code: 0250.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0404
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Political Science. $3 3177467
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-02A(E).
790 $a 0250
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10622169