東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Close Reading in Secondary Classroom...

Catterson, Amy Koehler.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Close Reading in Secondary Classrooms: A 21st-Century Update for a 20th-Century Practice.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Close Reading in Secondary Classrooms: A 21st-Century Update for a 20th-Century Practice./
作者:	Catterson, Amy Koehler.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	141 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-11A(E).
標題:	Reading instruction. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10281978
ISBN:	9780355034103

Close Reading in Secondary Classrooms: A 21st-Century Update for a 20th-Century Practice.
Catterson, Amy Koehler.

Close Reading in Secondary Classrooms: A 21st-Century Update for a 20th-Century Practice. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 141 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2017.

Close reading is an enigmatic term with a simple definition: special attention to texts. Key shifts in the Common Core State Standards have led to a renewed interest about close reading instruction among researchers and practitioners of K-12 education. Close reading is particularly salient in secondary settings, where calls to raise text difficulty and increase literacy instruction in the disciplines have placed new demands on middle and high school teachers. But even though close reading is now widespread in secondary classrooms, there is very little research to date on close reading instruction. As such we still do not know how these practices will affect students' reading skills and motivation.

ISBN: 9780355034103Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122756
Reading instruction.

Close Reading in Secondary Classrooms: A 21st-Century Update for a 20th-Century Practice.
LDR:05257nmm a2200373 4500 001 2156089
005 20180517123955.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355034103
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10281978
035 $a (MiAaPQ)berkeley:16975
035 $a AAI10281978
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Catterson, Amy Koehler. $3 3343853
245 1 0 $a Close Reading in Secondary Classrooms: A 21st-Century Update for a 20th-Century Practice.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 141 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: P. David Pearson.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2017.
520 $a Close reading is an enigmatic term with a simple definition: special attention to texts. Key shifts in the Common Core State Standards have led to a renewed interest about close reading instruction among researchers and practitioners of K-12 education. Close reading is particularly salient in secondary settings, where calls to raise text difficulty and increase literacy instruction in the disciplines have placed new demands on middle and high school teachers. But even though close reading is now widespread in secondary classrooms, there is very little research to date on close reading instruction. As such we still do not know how these practices will affect students' reading skills and motivation.
520 $a In this dissertation, I offer three article-length contributions to the research base on secondary close reading instruction. First, I synthesize practice-based research on close reading instruction with the aim of identifying best practices for close reading in secondary classrooms. I then present two empirical articles that address gaps in the research literature on adolescent close reading instruction.
520 $a In chapter 1, previously published in Adolescent Literacies: A Handbook of Practice-Based Research, P. David Pearson and I offer a vision for a 21st-century close reading pedagogy. This vision was influenced by a historical account of close reading's place in adolescent classrooms over the past 75 years and a review of research on secondary close reading instruction. We argue that a 21st-century close reading pedagogy must encompass considerations of the reader and his or her sociocultural contexts, accept digital and everyday texts as candidates for close readings, and include purposes for reading beyond knowledge building. In light of these goals, we suggest five principles of adolescent close reading instruction: background knowledge, authentic reading and writing, metadiscursive awareness, critical literacy, and dialogically organized discussion.
520 $a In chapter 2, I draw on the principles of close reading instruction outlined in chapter 1 to co-design tests of close reading instruction with a high school chemistry teacher. In this formative experiment, I tested the effect of background knowledge activation on amount and types of questions written about a scientific article; I also tested whether allowing students to choose texts to read about a scientific issue affected the amount of information written on that topic and their motivation to read. In a challenge to Common-Core-era recommendations that background knowledge should be held at bay when closely reading texts, I found that students who had their background knowledge activated with pre-reading activities prior to closely reading an article wrote more argument-generating questions than students who did not engage in pre-reading activities. I also argue that students who were able to choose a text to read closely about a scientific topic online recorded as much accurate information about that topic as students who were assigned a text to read by their teacher.
520 $a In chapter 3, I explore an understudied area of close reading instruction: students' everyday digital close reading practices. This article is an ethnographic case study of students' out-of-school digital close readings and their teachers' approach to digital close reading instruction in the classroom. By comparing these two realms through the lens of cultural historical activity theory, I am able to surface tensions and synergies that may lead to recommendations for close reading instruction that leverages students' existing funds of knowledge about digital literacies. Specifically, I found that when teachers designed digital close reading instruction in the service of promoting student-directed learning, it aligned well with students' goals when they performed everyday close readings of digital texts at home.
520 $a Together, these three chapters suggest new directions for adolescent close reading instruction and research. In chapter 4, I synthesize across the three articles to highlight common themes and conclude with ideas for future research and lingering questions about the nature of close reading.
590 $a School code: 0028.
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
690 $a 0535
690 $a 0456
690 $a 0710
710 2 $a University of California, Berkeley. $b Education. $3 1670269
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-11A(E).
790 $a 0028
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10281978