東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The Effect of Smiling on Perception ...

Popovic, Jovana.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Effect of Smiling on Perception of Different Emotion Categories.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Effect of Smiling on Perception of Different Emotion Categories./
Author:	Popovic, Jovana.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
Description:	58 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International56-04(E).
Subject:	Physiological psychology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10284512
ISBN:	9781369851984

The Effect of Smiling on Perception of Different Emotion Categories.
Popovic, Jovana.

The Effect of Smiling on Perception of Different Emotion Categories. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 58 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04.

Thesis (M.A.)--Webster University, 2017.

Smiling may not only be an outcome of an emotion but also have a direct impact on one's emotional experience. This is the idea behind the Facial Feedback theory and it holds an important position in recent theories of emotions. In this study, the theory has been experimentally researched by focusing on both implicit and explicit responses while having each participant go through two facial conditions and being presented with the pleasant, unpleasant and neutral stimuli (affective pictures). Implicit responses collected are startle reflex modulation, skin conductance and heart rate, whereas the explicit ones are the self-ratings of valence and arousal. Two facial conditions which each participant went through were fake smiling and non-smiling. What we found out is that there is a highly significant discrepancy between implicit and explicit responses, meaning that our consciousness and non-consciousness in respect to the facial feedback theory do not match. As for explicit responses, smiling proves to have an expected effect on the self-rated pleasantness level: when fake-smiling people consciously rate pictures more positively on the valence scale, across all emotion categories. This means that the facial feedback theory is true for the explicit responses collected in this study. Nevertheless, being reflective of implicit responses, the results showed that our brain responses not only fail to perceive pictures more positively when fake smiling but also, in fact, perceive pictures more negatively. This means that the facial feedback theory does not truly represent what goes on deep in one's brain.

ISBN: 9781369851984Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144820
Physiological psychology.

The Effect of Smiling on Perception of Different Emotion Categories.
LDR:02508nmm a2200301 4500 001 2153409
005 20171110135145.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369851984
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10284512
035 $a AAI10284512
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Popovic, Jovana. $3 3341131
245 1 4 $a The Effect of Smiling on Perception of Different Emotion Categories.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 58 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04.
500 $a Adviser: Peter Walla.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Webster University, 2017.
520 $a Smiling may not only be an outcome of an emotion but also have a direct impact on one's emotional experience. This is the idea behind the Facial Feedback theory and it holds an important position in recent theories of emotions. In this study, the theory has been experimentally researched by focusing on both implicit and explicit responses while having each participant go through two facial conditions and being presented with the pleasant, unpleasant and neutral stimuli (affective pictures). Implicit responses collected are startle reflex modulation, skin conductance and heart rate, whereas the explicit ones are the self-ratings of valence and arousal. Two facial conditions which each participant went through were fake smiling and non-smiling. What we found out is that there is a highly significant discrepancy between implicit and explicit responses, meaning that our consciousness and non-consciousness in respect to the facial feedback theory do not match. As for explicit responses, smiling proves to have an expected effect on the self-rated pleasantness level: when fake-smiling people consciously rate pictures more positively on the valence scale, across all emotion categories. This means that the facial feedback theory is true for the explicit responses collected in this study. Nevertheless, being reflective of implicit responses, the results showed that our brain responses not only fail to perceive pictures more positively when fake smiling but also, in fact, perceive pictures more negatively. This means that the facial feedback theory does not truly represent what goes on deep in one's brain.
590 $a School code: 0813.
650 4 $a Physiological psychology. $3 2144820
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
690 $a 0989
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0633
710 2 $a Webster University. $b Psychology. $3 3341132
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 56-04(E).
790 $a 0813
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10284512