東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

On the social epistemological nature...

Kwon, Hannah.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

On the social epistemological nature of questions: A comparison of knowledge domains' question formulations on the topic of "memory".

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	On the social epistemological nature of questions: A comparison of knowledge domains' question formulations on the topic of "memory"./
Author:	Kwon, Hannah.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
Description:	374 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-04A(E).
Subject:	Library science. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10291831
ISBN:	9781369350104

On the social epistemological nature of questions: A comparison of knowledge domains' question formulations on the topic of "memory".
Kwon, Hannah.

On the social epistemological nature of questions: A comparison of knowledge domains' question formulations on the topic of "memory". - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 374 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2016.

If "information" is a central concept for library and information science, then "questions" are fundamental, for information "informs" relative to the question. But research focusing on questions as a central theoretical concept has been stymied by the paradox of the question, which observes that in order to ask one must know enough to know what one does not know (Flammer, 1981). This dissertation proposes that this paradox results from the limitations of the cognitive approach to questions as indications of individual information need, and that the paradox can be resolved by reframing questions as social epistemological tools of inquiry within knowledge domains. The questions posed by three knowledge domains -- neuroscience, literature, and computer engineering -- on the common topic of "memory" are analyzed in order to investigate how the domains' question formulations compare and what the comparisons convey about how to answer and the assumptions upon which question and answer are constructed. A method is developed for identifying the implicit questions that motivate and organize scholarly inquiry by analyzing dissertation abstracts as knowledge products of inquiry. The comparative question analysis of neuroscience, literature, and computer engineering dissertations' question formulations about "memory" supports the proposition that knowledge domains ask different questions and ask them differently. What they ask, the content of their questions, communicates the indeterminate epistemic situation that each domain has of memory, while the mode of presentation of the question, its form, conveys the epistemic structure of inquiry and the production of knowledge. A social epistemological model of domains' question formulations is developed that proposes that question content reflects domain ontologies, question form reflects domain epistemologies, and determinations of question relevance reflect domain sociality, which model has implications for document relevance, question negotiation, information retrieval design, and inquiry-based learning.

ISBN: 9781369350104Subjects--Topical Terms:

539284
Library science.

On the social epistemological nature of questions: A comparison of knowledge domains' question formulations on the topic of "memory".
LDR:03081nmm a2200289 4500 001 2123705
005 20171002081654.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369350104
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10291831
035 $a AAI10291831
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kwon, Hannah. $3 3285640
245 1 0 $a On the social epistemological nature of questions: A comparison of knowledge domains' question formulations on the topic of "memory".
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 374 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Ross Todd.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2016.
520 $a If "information" is a central concept for library and information science, then "questions" are fundamental, for information "informs" relative to the question. But research focusing on questions as a central theoretical concept has been stymied by the paradox of the question, which observes that in order to ask one must know enough to know what one does not know (Flammer, 1981). This dissertation proposes that this paradox results from the limitations of the cognitive approach to questions as indications of individual information need, and that the paradox can be resolved by reframing questions as social epistemological tools of inquiry within knowledge domains. The questions posed by three knowledge domains -- neuroscience, literature, and computer engineering -- on the common topic of "memory" are analyzed in order to investigate how the domains' question formulations compare and what the comparisons convey about how to answer and the assumptions upon which question and answer are constructed. A method is developed for identifying the implicit questions that motivate and organize scholarly inquiry by analyzing dissertation abstracts as knowledge products of inquiry. The comparative question analysis of neuroscience, literature, and computer engineering dissertations' question formulations about "memory" supports the proposition that knowledge domains ask different questions and ask them differently. What they ask, the content of their questions, communicates the indeterminate epistemic situation that each domain has of memory, while the mode of presentation of the question, its form, conveys the epistemic structure of inquiry and the production of knowledge. A social epistemological model of domains' question formulations is developed that proposes that question content reflects domain ontologies, question form reflects domain epistemologies, and determinations of question relevance reflect domain sociality, which model has implications for document relevance, question negotiation, information retrieval design, and inquiry-based learning.
590 $a School code: 0190.
650 4 $a Library science. $3 539284
650 4 $a Information science. $3 554358
690 $a 0399
690 $a 0723
710 2 $a Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick. $b Graduate School - New Brunswick. $3 1019196
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-04A(E).
790 $a 0190
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10291831