東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The match/mismatch relationship betw...

Huang, Yu-Jen Jamie.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The match/mismatch relationship between teaching and learning styles and its implication for students' academic performance: Evidence from Taiwanese pre-service teachers.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The match/mismatch relationship between teaching and learning styles and its implication for students' academic performance: Evidence from Taiwanese pre-service teachers./
Author:	Huang, Yu-Jen Jamie.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
Description:	159 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-12A(E).
Subject:	Teacher education. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10143766
ISBN:	9781339989600

The match/mismatch relationship between teaching and learning styles and its implication for students' academic performance: Evidence from Taiwanese pre-service teachers.
Huang, Yu-Jen Jamie.

The match/mismatch relationship between teaching and learning styles and its implication for students' academic performance: Evidence from Taiwanese pre-service teachers. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 159 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--La Sierra University, 2016.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

The purpose of the current study was to examine the match/mismatch relationship between teaching styles and learning styles in terms of student academic achievement in a Taiwanese teacher-training program, utilizing Four Model Application Techniques (4MAT) as a theoretical model. In a convenience sampling, 707 pre-service teaching program students and 22 professors participated in the survey study by completing the McCarthy Learning Type Measure Inventory (LTM) and Teaching Style Inventory (TSI), respectively. Academic achievement was measure by the professors' assigned final grades. Findings showed that the majority of educational university professors preferred the Analytic teaching style (Type II) while the dominant learning style was the Imaginative (Type I). Style match/mismatch on academic performance was examined in two statistical models. A dichotomous variable model for academic performance failed to show a significant relationship. A second model implemented mean differences between each teaching and each learning style. The findings revealed McCarthy's analytic match (Type II) had a significant positive relationship with student final scores while the dynamic match (Type IV) displayed a negative relationship with academic outcomes. The result indicated that style match matters, especially for Analytic and Dynamic learners. Along these lines, future studies may explore the following areas in terms of style match: experimental/qualitative research design employing other measurements for achievement and examination of teaching and learning styles in different cultures or groups.

ISBN: 9781339989600Subjects--Topical Terms:

3172312
Teacher education.

The match/mismatch relationship between teaching and learning styles and its implication for students' academic performance: Evidence from Taiwanese pre-service teachers.
LDR:02713nmm a2200313 4500 001 2122841
005 20170926091806.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339989600
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10143766
035 $a AAI10143766
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Huang, Yu-Jen Jamie. $3 3284814
245 1 4 $a The match/mismatch relationship between teaching and learning styles and its implication for students' academic performance: Evidence from Taiwanese pre-service teachers.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 159 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Chang-Ho Ji.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--La Sierra University, 2016.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
520 $a The purpose of the current study was to examine the match/mismatch relationship between teaching styles and learning styles in terms of student academic achievement in a Taiwanese teacher-training program, utilizing Four Model Application Techniques (4MAT) as a theoretical model. In a convenience sampling, 707 pre-service teaching program students and 22 professors participated in the survey study by completing the McCarthy Learning Type Measure Inventory (LTM) and Teaching Style Inventory (TSI), respectively. Academic achievement was measure by the professors' assigned final grades. Findings showed that the majority of educational university professors preferred the Analytic teaching style (Type II) while the dominant learning style was the Imaginative (Type I). Style match/mismatch on academic performance was examined in two statistical models. A dichotomous variable model for academic performance failed to show a significant relationship. A second model implemented mean differences between each teaching and each learning style. The findings revealed McCarthy's analytic match (Type II) had a significant positive relationship with student final scores while the dynamic match (Type IV) displayed a negative relationship with academic outcomes. The result indicated that style match matters, especially for Analytic and Dynamic learners. Along these lines, future studies may explore the following areas in terms of style match: experimental/qualitative research design employing other measurements for achievement and examination of teaching and learning styles in different cultures or groups.
590 $a School code: 1091.
650 4 $a Teacher education. $3 3172312
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Adult education. $3 543202
690 $a 0530
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0516
710 2 $a La Sierra University. $3 1026379
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-12A(E).
790 $a 1091
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10143766