東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Agricultural Social Infrastructure: ...

Henshaw, Thomas L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Agricultural Social Infrastructure: People, Policy, and Community Development.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Agricultural Social Infrastructure: People, Policy, and Community Development./
作者:	Henshaw, Thomas L.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:	292 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-02(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-02B(E).
標題:	Agriculture. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10145022
ISBN:	9781369005837

Agricultural Social Infrastructure: People, Policy, and Community Development.
Henshaw, Thomas L.

Agricultural Social Infrastructure: People, Policy, and Community Development. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 292 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-02(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Ohio State University, 2015.

An assumption exists in the public discourse regarding the future of agriculture at the Rural Urban Interface (RUI) that decline is all but inevitable. Yet, agriculture at the RUI continues to persist and in some cases thrive. Policy relating to land use and economic development has been the primary source of intervention in attempts to protect and bolster RUI agriculture. This research explores the hypothesis that communities with stronger network relationships, a concept I call agricultural social infrastructure (ASI), will be more likely to have land use and economic development policies in place and in such perform better in relation to maintaining or growing agriculture in there respective counties than counties without strong ASI and policy. Additionally, this work looks to incorporate a holistic model of county structural impact on agricultural outcomes. The primary addition to this model is the inclusion the national commodity crop productivity index (NCCPI) and rating of prime farmland. Each of these measures serves to capture the inherent production capacity of agricultural lands.

ISBN: 9781369005837Subjects--Topical Terms:

518588
Agriculture.

Agricultural Social Infrastructure: People, Policy, and Community Development.
LDR:03746nmm a2200325 4500 001 2120946
005 20170724102931.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369005837
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10145022
035 $a AAI10145022
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Henshaw, Thomas L. $3 3282920
245 1 0 $a Agricultural Social Infrastructure: People, Policy, and Community Development.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 292 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-02(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Jeff Sharp.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Ohio State University, 2015.
520 $a An assumption exists in the public discourse regarding the future of agriculture at the Rural Urban Interface (RUI) that decline is all but inevitable. Yet, agriculture at the RUI continues to persist and in some cases thrive. Policy relating to land use and economic development has been the primary source of intervention in attempts to protect and bolster RUI agriculture. This research explores the hypothesis that communities with stronger network relationships, a concept I call agricultural social infrastructure (ASI), will be more likely to have land use and economic development policies in place and in such perform better in relation to maintaining or growing agriculture in there respective counties than counties without strong ASI and policy. Additionally, this work looks to incorporate a holistic model of county structural impact on agricultural outcomes. The primary addition to this model is the inclusion the national commodity crop productivity index (NCCPI) and rating of prime farmland. Each of these measures serves to capture the inherent production capacity of agricultural lands.
520 $a This research is important in that it looks to fill two fundamental gaps in the literature relating to RUI agriculture. First, can we identify a path for the creation and implementation of public policy relating to the social infrastructure in a community? Second, are their particular types of agricultural lands in production in the RUI that lead to better overall success relative to income and the maintenance of farmland production? To test these hypotheses, a number of methods were used. Key informants in agriculturally important RUI counties were administered a survey to determine the extent of agricultural programming and policy in place in the county as well as to establish the strength of network relationships associated with ASI. Additionally, data was drawn from the USDA census of agriculture for 2002-2012 as well as from the NRCS- National Resources Inventory 2007 to establish trends in production, land use, and economic returns and to establish a soil profile for the counties.
520 $a In all, there is little support for the hypothesis that social infrastructure and agricultural policy play an important role in shaping county level agricultural outcomes at the RUI. Conversely, there is substantial support for the impact of soil quality on county level agricultural outcomes, as well as support for the hypothesis that particular production typologies will be associated with inherent soil characteristics. This research both adds to a body of literature regarding the nature of decision making and farm persistence at the RUI and opens the door for additional inquiry in the underdeveloped area of soil quality – agricultural system relationships.
590 $a School code: 0168.
650 4 $a Agriculture. $3 518588
650 4 $a Land use planning. $3 2122760
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
690 $a 0473
690 $a 0536
690 $a 0626
710 2 $a The Ohio State University. $b Rural Sociology. $3 3282921
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-02B(E).
790 $a 0168
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10145022