東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The proliferation of arbitration: De...

Moreno, Hilario, Jr.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The proliferation of arbitration: Democratic concerns.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The proliferation of arbitration: Democratic concerns./
Author:	Moreno, Hilario, Jr.
Description:	73 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International54-04(E).
Subject:	Law. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1588463
ISBN:	9781321739596

The proliferation of arbitration: Democratic concerns.
Moreno, Hilario, Jr.

The proliferation of arbitration: Democratic concerns. - 73 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-04.

Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Texas at San Antonio, 2015.

The last twenty-five years has seen an explosion in the use of arbitration--the private, binding resolution of disputes--as an alternative to the public court system of justice. This phenomenon has garnered widespread scholarly and public debate over the fairness of arbitration and its results. However, largely missed in the scholarly debate are the implications of the displacement by arbitration of the public system of justice. While the arbitral and public forums both provide for resolution of civil disputes, the arbitral forum does not and cannot function in the manner that the public system of justice affords. Arbitration is in fact inimical to democracy. This paper shall demonstrate that the public system of justice does more than resolve disputes. Unlike the arbitral forum, the Court (1) Enhance the rule of law: (2) Engage in advice-giving both to the public and other branches of government: (3) Engage various groups in democratic participation through political mobilization or interest group litigation; (4) Provide an effective means of invalidating and/or a "look-back" upon Congressional policy; (5) Preserves democratic ordering; and (6) Provides a source of legitimacy in an authoritative position necessary to social ordering and compliance. This paper answers the call of Richard Reuben who recently noted that very little scholarly attention has been paid to the relationship between arbitration and democracy.

ISBN: 9781321739596Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

The proliferation of arbitration: Democratic concerns.
LDR:02282nmm a2200277 4500 001 2079196
005 20161210083250.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321739596
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1588463
035 $a AAI1588463
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Moreno, Hilario, Jr. $3 3194860
245 1 4 $a The proliferation of arbitration: Democratic concerns.
300 $a 73 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-04.
500 $a Adviser: Daniel Engster.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Texas at San Antonio, 2015.
520 $a The last twenty-five years has seen an explosion in the use of arbitration--the private, binding resolution of disputes--as an alternative to the public court system of justice. This phenomenon has garnered widespread scholarly and public debate over the fairness of arbitration and its results. However, largely missed in the scholarly debate are the implications of the displacement by arbitration of the public system of justice. While the arbitral and public forums both provide for resolution of civil disputes, the arbitral forum does not and cannot function in the manner that the public system of justice affords. Arbitration is in fact inimical to democracy. This paper shall demonstrate that the public system of justice does more than resolve disputes. Unlike the arbitral forum, the Court (1) Enhance the rule of law: (2) Engage in advice-giving both to the public and other branches of government: (3) Engage various groups in democratic participation through political mobilization or interest group litigation; (4) Provide an effective means of invalidating and/or a "look-back" upon Congressional policy; (5) Preserves democratic ordering; and (6) Provides a source of legitimacy in an authoritative position necessary to social ordering and compliance. This paper answers the call of Richard Reuben who recently noted that very little scholarly attention has been paid to the relationship between arbitration and democracy.
590 $a School code: 1283.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Alternative dispute resolution. $3 3168470
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0649
710 2 $a The University of Texas at San Antonio. $b Political Science & Geography. $3 1034047
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 54-04(E).
790 $a 1283
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1588463