東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The judicialization of politics in n...

Lin, Chien-Chih.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The judicialization of politics in new democracies.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The judicialization of politics in new democracies./
作者:	Lin, Chien-Chih.
面頁冊數:	311 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-11A(E).
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3711284
ISBN:	9781321874310

The judicialization of politics in new democracies.
Lin, Chien-Chih.

The judicialization of politics in new democracies. - 311 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: A.

Thesis (J.S.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2015.

Since the end of 20th century, judicial expansion has been observed around the globe to such an extent that the judicialization of politics is now commonplace not only in established democracies, but also in nascent ones. Conventional wisdom has long held that political fragmentation is one critical factor that contributes to this trend. Yet it is by no means the only one, since the development of the judicialization of politics varies across different countries in which the political environments are equally unstable. This dissertation endeavors to fill this academic lacuna by comparing six new democracies in Latin America (Bolivia, Brazil, and Mexico) and Asia (Indonesia, Korea, and Taiwan), applying the most similar cases approach. These cases demonstrate the core element of judicialization of politics: the instrumentality of the judiciary. The judiciary will neither be empowered nor be entrusted with policy-making powers if it is of no use to politicians and citizens. Nonetheless, this still begs the question of why there are different levels of judicialization of politics in variant countries. Here, institutional design in each country directly influences the degree of judicialization of politics. After synthesizing the institutional elements and instrumental factors, my dissertation suggests the following tentative conclusions: 1). political environment matters; 2). a new constitution matters; 3). civil society (judicial popularity) matters. When the political environment is more unstable, when a country enacts a new constitution after democratization, and when civil society is more vibrant, the judicialization of politics will be more comprehensive and intensive.

ISBN: 9781321874310Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

The judicialization of politics in new democracies.
LDR:02566nmm a2200277 4500 001 2078794
005 20161129073907.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321874310
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3711284
035 $a AAI3711284
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lin, Chien-Chih. $3 3194413
245 1 4 $a The judicialization of politics in new democracies.
300 $a 311 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Tom Ginsburg; Gerald Rosenberg.
502 $a Thesis (J.S.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2015.
520 $a Since the end of 20th century, judicial expansion has been observed around the globe to such an extent that the judicialization of politics is now commonplace not only in established democracies, but also in nascent ones. Conventional wisdom has long held that political fragmentation is one critical factor that contributes to this trend. Yet it is by no means the only one, since the development of the judicialization of politics varies across different countries in which the political environments are equally unstable. This dissertation endeavors to fill this academic lacuna by comparing six new democracies in Latin America (Bolivia, Brazil, and Mexico) and Asia (Indonesia, Korea, and Taiwan), applying the most similar cases approach. These cases demonstrate the core element of judicialization of politics: the instrumentality of the judiciary. The judiciary will neither be empowered nor be entrusted with policy-making powers if it is of no use to politicians and citizens. Nonetheless, this still begs the question of why there are different levels of judicialization of politics in variant countries. Here, institutional design in each country directly influences the degree of judicialization of politics. After synthesizing the institutional elements and instrumental factors, my dissertation suggests the following tentative conclusions: 1). political environment matters; 2). a new constitution matters; 3). civil society (judicial popularity) matters. When the political environment is more unstable, when a country enacts a new constitution after democratization, and when civil society is more vibrant, the judicialization of politics will be more comprehensive and intensive.
590 $a School code: 0330.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a International law. $3 560784
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0616
710 2 $a The University of Chicago. $b Law. $3 1673717
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-11A(E).
790 $a 0330
791 $a J.S.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3711284