東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Free Speech Balancing Act of Dig...

Johnson, Brett Gregory.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Free Speech Balancing Act of Digital Intermediaries: An explication of the concept of content governance.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Free Speech Balancing Act of Digital Intermediaries: An explication of the concept of content governance./
作者:	Johnson, Brett Gregory.
面頁冊數:	323 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-03A(E).
標題:	Mass communication. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3727789
ISBN:	9781339130064

The Free Speech Balancing Act of Digital Intermediaries: An explication of the concept of content governance.
Johnson, Brett Gregory.

The Free Speech Balancing Act of Digital Intermediaries: An explication of the concept of content governance. - 323 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2015.

This study explicates the concept of governance by mainstream online digital intermediaries such as Facebook, YouTube and Twitter over extreme user-generated content (UGC)---a.k.a. "content governance." The study synthesizes First Amendment theory and jurisprudence, as well as theories about the interconnected power roles of individuals and digital intermediaries, to explicate how such content is governed in an environment of global networked communication. Two key questions guide this explication: How and why do digital communication intermediaries respond to extreme UGC? What are the potential implications of their responses for public discourse in a system of networked communication? This study also examines ethical duties that digital intermediaries may have to protect speech or prevent harm. This synthesis of theories is applied to an empirical case-study analysis of how Facebook has changed its community guidelines throughout the 11 years of its existence. This analysis will look at examples of Facebook removing or not removing extreme UGC from its platform. The purpose of this analysis is to assess how the norms of freedom of expression are being negotiated in a networked communication environment facilitated by digital intermediaries.

ISBN: 9781339130064Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144804
Mass communication.

The Free Speech Balancing Act of Digital Intermediaries: An explication of the concept of content governance.
LDR:02209nmm a2200301 4500 001 2077843
005 20161114132436.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339130064
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3727789
035 $a AAI3727789
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Johnson, Brett Gregory. $3 3193379
245 1 4 $a The Free Speech Balancing Act of Digital Intermediaries: An explication of the concept of content governance.
300 $a 323 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Amy K. Sanders.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2015.
520 $a This study explicates the concept of governance by mainstream online digital intermediaries such as Facebook, YouTube and Twitter over extreme user-generated content (UGC)---a.k.a. "content governance." The study synthesizes First Amendment theory and jurisprudence, as well as theories about the interconnected power roles of individuals and digital intermediaries, to explicate how such content is governed in an environment of global networked communication. Two key questions guide this explication: How and why do digital communication intermediaries respond to extreme UGC? What are the potential implications of their responses for public discourse in a system of networked communication? This study also examines ethical duties that digital intermediaries may have to protect speech or prevent harm. This synthesis of theories is applied to an empirical case-study analysis of how Facebook has changed its community guidelines throughout the 11 years of its existence. This analysis will look at examples of Facebook removing or not removing extreme UGC from its platform. The purpose of this analysis is to assess how the norms of freedom of expression are being negotiated in a networked communication environment facilitated by digital intermediaries.
590 $a School code: 0130.
650 4 $a Mass communication. $3 2144804
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 517264
690 $a 0708
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0394
710 2 $a University of Minnesota. $b Mass Communication. $3 1057384
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-03A(E).
790 $a 0130
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3727789