東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Examining institutional climate in h...

Jacobsen, Linda Fraser.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Examining institutional climate in higher education: Administering the NILIE-PACE instrument at a private university in central China.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Examining institutional climate in higher education: Administering the NILIE-PACE instrument at a private university in central China./
作者:	Jacobsen, Linda Fraser.
面頁冊數:	264 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-06(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-06A(E).
標題:	Educational evaluation. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3552329
ISBN:	9781267907752

Examining institutional climate in higher education: Administering the NILIE-PACE instrument at a private university in central China.
Jacobsen, Linda Fraser.

Examining institutional climate in higher education: Administering the NILIE-PACE instrument at a private university in central China. - 264 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-06(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Missouri - Saint Louis, 2012.

The first known campus climate study in central China was conducted for purposes of formative assessment by mixed methods, utilizing an instrument called the Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE) developed by the National Initiative for Leadership and Institutional Effectiveness (NILIE) at North Carolina State University in Raleigh. Surveys were translated into Mandarin and distributed in bilingual format to 1,170 campus employees at Central China University (a pseudonym) in Henan Province, and 945 surveys were returned, a rate of 80.8%. Participants who self-identified included both Chinese and foreign faculty, administrators and staff. Because the North American-normed instrument was administered in China, differences in latent factors and item groupings (loadings) were also studied using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and parallel analysis (PA) to confirm findings. Overall climate scores as well as five latent climate factors were measured and identified, and a reliability analysis was conducted on the five latent climate variables. Axial coding of over 800 participant responses to two open-ended questions was also conducted. Of the five latent factors that emerged, elements related to organizational and institutional effectiveness received the most attention from participants (n = 943), with an alpha coefficient of 0.948, followed by individual workplace communication and cooperation, with an alpha of 0.928. Participant comments with the highest frequencies revolved around low salary, overly rigid regulations, a beautiful campus, lack of access to information, lack of shared governance and the locus of decision making in both management and academic settings on campus. Foreign faculty raised campus communication issues that resulted in a sense of cultural isolation, while the Chinese faculty overall identified a lack of further training and learning opportunities and limited input on curriculum, testing and grading decisions. Both Chinese and foreign faculty were concerned about issues surrounding academic integrity and honesty. Administrators were most concerned with a lack of cooperation and communication between departments and inconsistent policies.

ISBN: 9781267907752Subjects--Topical Terms:

526425
Educational evaluation.

Examining institutional climate in higher education: Administering the NILIE-PACE instrument at a private university in central China.
LDR:03183nmm a2200289 4500 001 2074126
005 20160927125348.5
008 170521s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267907752
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3552329
035 $a AAI3552329
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Jacobsen, Linda Fraser. $3 3189428
245 1 0 $a Examining institutional climate in higher education: Administering the NILIE-PACE instrument at a private university in central China.
300 $a 264 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-06(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Lloyd I. Richardson.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Missouri - Saint Louis, 2012.
520 $a The first known campus climate study in central China was conducted for purposes of formative assessment by mixed methods, utilizing an instrument called the Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE) developed by the National Initiative for Leadership and Institutional Effectiveness (NILIE) at North Carolina State University in Raleigh. Surveys were translated into Mandarin and distributed in bilingual format to 1,170 campus employees at Central China University (a pseudonym) in Henan Province, and 945 surveys were returned, a rate of 80.8%. Participants who self-identified included both Chinese and foreign faculty, administrators and staff. Because the North American-normed instrument was administered in China, differences in latent factors and item groupings (loadings) were also studied using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and parallel analysis (PA) to confirm findings. Overall climate scores as well as five latent climate factors were measured and identified, and a reliability analysis was conducted on the five latent climate variables. Axial coding of over 800 participant responses to two open-ended questions was also conducted. Of the five latent factors that emerged, elements related to organizational and institutional effectiveness received the most attention from participants (n = 943), with an alpha coefficient of 0.948, followed by individual workplace communication and cooperation, with an alpha of 0.928. Participant comments with the highest frequencies revolved around low salary, overly rigid regulations, a beautiful campus, lack of access to information, lack of shared governance and the locus of decision making in both management and academic settings on campus. Foreign faculty raised campus communication issues that resulted in a sense of cultural isolation, while the Chinese faculty overall identified a lack of further training and learning opportunities and limited input on curriculum, testing and grading decisions. Both Chinese and foreign faculty were concerned about issues surrounding academic integrity and honesty. Administrators were most concerned with a lack of cooperation and communication between departments and inconsistent policies.
590 $a School code: 0481.
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
650 4 $a Higher education administration. $3 2122863
650 4 $a Organizational behavior. $3 516683
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0446
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a University of Missouri - Saint Louis. $b College of Education. $3 1674340
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-06A(E).
790 $a 0481
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2012
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3552329