東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

People, power, and the state: The ef...

Ritter, Zacchary R.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

People, power, and the state: The effect of patron intervention on unarmed insurrections.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	People, power, and the state: The effect of patron intervention on unarmed insurrections./
Author:	Ritter, Zacchary R.
Description:	412 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-03A(E).
Subject:	Political science. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3733839
ISBN:	9781339222349

People, power, and the state: The effect of patron intervention on unarmed insurrections.
Ritter, Zacchary R.

People, power, and the state: The effect of patron intervention on unarmed insurrections. - 412 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2015.

Unarmed insurrectionary (UI) campaigns demanding irregular regime change seem destined to failure, but such social movements surprisingly succeed more often than not. Explanations for campaign outcome tend to focus on movement skill or variation in domestic-level structural factors. Few studies shift attention to the potentially decisive role of external intervention during these domestic struggles. Despite some well-known exceptions like the Iranian Revolution, patron states have played an important role in determining the fate of several unarmed insurrections as intended. The outcome of UI campaigns rests not only on the domestic balance of forces and the decisions of key elite players, but also on the disposition of great powers and regional powers with a stake in the result.

ISBN: 9781339222349Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.

People, power, and the state: The effect of patron intervention on unarmed insurrections.
LDR:03207nmm a2200289 4500 001 2072855
005 20160822133537.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339222349
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3733839
035 $a AAI3733839
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ritter, Zacchary R. $3 3188077
245 1 0 $a People, power, and the state: The effect of patron intervention on unarmed insurrections.
300 $a 412 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Andrew Bennett.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2015.
520 $a Unarmed insurrectionary (UI) campaigns demanding irregular regime change seem destined to failure, but such social movements surprisingly succeed more often than not. Explanations for campaign outcome tend to focus on movement skill or variation in domestic-level structural factors. Few studies shift attention to the potentially decisive role of external intervention during these domestic struggles. Despite some well-known exceptions like the Iranian Revolution, patron states have played an important role in determining the fate of several unarmed insurrections as intended. The outcome of UI campaigns rests not only on the domestic balance of forces and the decisions of key elite players, but also on the disposition of great powers and regional powers with a stake in the result.
520 $a This dissertation addresses three interrelated questions to advance our understanding of the role patron states play during these domestic struggles over control for the state. First, do great powers and regional powers systematically alter the likelihood of UI campaign success? Using a novel measure for patron state intervention, quantitative analysis suggests that the probability of UI campaign success depends on how patron states react. Second, how do patron states transform latent leverage into actual influence aside from the explicit threat or actual use of military force? After reviewing all cases of patron intervention, I identify three generalizable causal mechanisms -- isolate and unite, feast or famine, and decapitation -- patron states employ to channel the dynamics of UI campaigns to a desirable outcome. Third, why do some external interventions fail? The deviant cases suggest that several factors limit the patron's ability to shape the outcome of UI campaigns. Nonetheless, domestic institutional configurations that intimately link the institutional interests of the security services to the current regime leadership and/or competing bureaucratic and business interests within the patron state that hinders the formulation of a coherent foreign policy appear most important. Ultimately, this dissertation seeks to advance the emerging research program in security studies on nonviolent resistance and irregular regime overthrow by capturing the role patron states play during UI campaigns.
590 $a School code: 0076.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Peace studies. $3 3172392
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0563
710 2 $a Georgetown University. $b Government. $3 1043944
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-03A(E).
790 $a 0076
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3733839