東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Determining the reliability and vali...

Soelberg, Juliette.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Determining the reliability and validity of the newest vital sign in the inpatient setting.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Determining the reliability and validity of the newest vital sign in the inpatient setting./
作者:	Soelberg, Juliette.
面頁冊數:	107 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International54-05(E).
標題:	Educational tests & measurements. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1526546
ISBN:	9781321863390

Determining the reliability and validity of the newest vital sign in the inpatient setting.
Soelberg, Juliette.

Determining the reliability and validity of the newest vital sign in the inpatient setting. - 107 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-05.

Thesis (M.S.)--Rush University, 2015.

The purpose of the study was to determine if the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) was a reliable and valid health literacy assessment tool to be used in the inpatient setting. The NVS and the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA), which was used as the criterion in the study, were administered to patients at Rush University Medical Center. Cronbach's a for the NVS (a=0.37) indicated that the NVS is not a reliable health literacy assessment tool. Correlation between the NVS and S-TOFHLA was similar to previous research (rho=0.59). Participants were more likely to score lower on the STOFHLA if they were non-Hispanic Black, had a high school education or lower, or were 60 years old or above. These characteristics may be taken into consideration as a physician approaches a patient with care and attention to potential low health literacy.

ISBN: 9781321863390Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168483
Educational tests & measurements.

Determining the reliability and validity of the newest vital sign in the inpatient setting.
LDR:01691nmm a2200265 4500 001 2069403
005 20160513093942.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321863390
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1526546
035 $a AAI1526546
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Soelberg, Juliette. $3 3184416
245 1 0 $a Determining the reliability and validity of the newest vital sign in the inpatient setting.
300 $a 107 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-05.
500 $a Adviser: Kathryn S. Keim.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Rush University, 2015.
520 $a The purpose of the study was to determine if the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) was a reliable and valid health literacy assessment tool to be used in the inpatient setting. The NVS and the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA), which was used as the criterion in the study, were administered to patients at Rush University Medical Center. Cronbach's a for the NVS (a=0.37) indicated that the NVS is not a reliable health literacy assessment tool. Correlation between the NVS and S-TOFHLA was similar to previous research (rho=0.59). Participants were more likely to score lower on the STOFHLA if they were non-Hispanic Black, had a high school education or lower, or were 60 years old or above. These characteristics may be taken into consideration as a physician approaches a patient with care and attention to potential low health literacy.
590 $a School code: 0821.
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
690 $a 0288
710 2 $a Rush University. $3 1261752
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 54-05(E).
790 $a 0821
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1526546