東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Are partnerships the solution?: Expl...

Bhan, Manjyot.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Are partnerships the solution?: Exploring the constraints of the U.S. environmental regulatory system.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Are partnerships the solution?: Exploring the constraints of the U.S. environmental regulatory system./
Author:	Bhan, Manjyot.
Description:	254 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-02A(E).
Subject:	Public policy. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3728925
ISBN:	9781339146539

Are partnerships the solution?: Exploring the constraints of the U.S. environmental regulatory system.
Bhan, Manjyot.

Are partnerships the solution?: Exploring the constraints of the U.S. environmental regulatory system. - 254 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--American University, 2015.

Traditionally, regulation of the environment has been predominantly under the purview of the public sector. Through watershed environmental laws of the late 1960s and early 1970s, such as the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and Toxic Substances Control Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)---with delegation of responsibilities to the states for enforcement---effectively regulated most single-media environmental problems such as industrial air pollution, point- source water pollution (Fiorino 2006; Kraft 2004). These statutes were primarily based on the "rules-and-deterrence" approach. However, the old paradigm has not evolved with the changing second-and third-generation "wicked" policy problems (such as climate change, biodiversity loss). This research argues that the failure of U.S. environmental regulations to adapt to the changing problems along with the political gridlock has constrained EPA's ability to effectively address 21st century problems. The study proposes that in order to overcome the managerial, legal, and political constraints, the EPA officials seek partnerships. The study offers a conceptual framework that categorizes these constraints into (i) administrative rationalism (ii) adversarial legalism (iii) limits on agency autonomy. By analyzing three EPA-led partnerships using a conceptual framework of constraints, the study answer the following questions (i) what motivates agency officials' to seek partnerships (ii) to what extent do partnerships meet the agency officials' expectations. Only the first two categories of constraints are studied empirically. The third category is offered as an area for future empirical research.

ISBN: 9781339146539Subjects--Topical Terms:

532803
Public policy.

Are partnerships the solution?: Exploring the constraints of the U.S. environmental regulatory system.
LDR:03886nmm a2200289 4500 001 2067751
005 20160418090159.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339146539
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3728925
035 $a AAI3728925
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Bhan, Manjyot. $3 3182616
245 1 0 $a Are partnerships the solution?: Exploring the constraints of the U.S. environmental regulatory system.
300 $a 254 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Daniel J. Fiorino.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--American University, 2015.
520 $a Traditionally, regulation of the environment has been predominantly under the purview of the public sector. Through watershed environmental laws of the late 1960s and early 1970s, such as the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and Toxic Substances Control Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)---with delegation of responsibilities to the states for enforcement---effectively regulated most single-media environmental problems such as industrial air pollution, point- source water pollution (Fiorino 2006; Kraft 2004). These statutes were primarily based on the "rules-and-deterrence" approach. However, the old paradigm has not evolved with the changing second-and third-generation "wicked" policy problems (such as climate change, biodiversity loss). This research argues that the failure of U.S. environmental regulations to adapt to the changing problems along with the political gridlock has constrained EPA's ability to effectively address 21st century problems. The study proposes that in order to overcome the managerial, legal, and political constraints, the EPA officials seek partnerships. The study offers a conceptual framework that categorizes these constraints into (i) administrative rationalism (ii) adversarial legalism (iii) limits on agency autonomy. By analyzing three EPA-led partnerships using a conceptual framework of constraints, the study answer the following questions (i) what motivates agency officials' to seek partnerships (ii) to what extent do partnerships meet the agency officials' expectations. Only the first two categories of constraints are studied empirically. The third category is offered as an area for future empirical research.
520 $a Three EPA-led partnerships that were analyzed for this study are: the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (2009-present), the PFOA Stewardship Program (2006-2015), and the Combined Heat and Power Partnership (2001-present). Results show that these partnerships were created to reduce certain sub-categories of the administrative rationalism and adversarial legalism constraint. The motivation to reduce regulatory inflexibility and barriers to policy innovation were important across all three partnerships. In all three cases the partnerships met the expectations of the EPA officials. Results support the proposition that EPA created these partnerships to overcome certain defects or supplement the Clean Water Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, and the Clean Air Act. The partnerships however, are not prescribed as a silver bullet to solve all our contemporary environmental problems, but as one of the strategies in a regulator's toolbox. The results have implications for public policy scholars and practitioners interested in exploring partnerships as a way to reduce the administrative, legal, and political constraints of the U.S. regulatory system, and thereby enhance a federal agency's problem-solving capacity to address complex contemporary environmental policy problems.
590 $a School code: 0008.
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Environmental law. $3 560666
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0439
710 2 $a American University. $b Public Administration and Policy. $3 2098067
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-02A(E).
790 $a 0008
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3728925