東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Reconsidering teacher commentary as ...

Morris, Deborah Eileen.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Reconsidering teacher commentary as interactive and collaborative dialogue: Implications for student writing and revising.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Reconsidering teacher commentary as interactive and collaborative dialogue: Implications for student writing and revising./
Author:	Morris, Deborah Eileen.
Description:	340 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-05(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-05A(E).
Subject:	Reading instruction. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3670762
ISBN:	9781321477078

Reconsidering teacher commentary as interactive and collaborative dialogue: Implications for student writing and revising.
Morris, Deborah Eileen.

Reconsidering teacher commentary as interactive and collaborative dialogue: Implications for student writing and revising. - 340 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-05(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Bowling Green State University, 2014.

This dissertation focuses on teacher commentary as formative assessment and as collaborative dialogue that actively engages both teacher and student writers in conversations about the writing. Student voices are emphasized throughout this teacher research study of two classes at a Midwestern community college, a study that explores what the FYC student writers want and value in teacher commentary as they write and revise. With a particular research project acting as the contextual "center" of the dialogue, multiple data collection instruments were employed, including: student-generated texts and self-assessments, pre-and post-project questionnaires, personal interviews, and personal observations and reflections from teacher and students. Analysis of this data draws upon feminist theory, grounded theory and an ethnographic perspective to discover, describe, and assess the multiple and varied contexts surrounding student writing and revising as well as student values within these complex contexts. I argue that students do value the collaborative dialogue, interactions and formative assessment found in commentary that gives the students a voice in their own writing and revising, and I further argue that this intentional and rhetorical response to student writing sends a powerful message to those student writers about what we in the field of Rhetoric and Composition truly value in writing.

ISBN: 9781321477078Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122756
Reading instruction.

Reconsidering teacher commentary as interactive and collaborative dialogue: Implications for student writing and revising.
LDR:02394nmm a2200313 4500 001 2066306
005 20151223084720.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321477078
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3670762
035 $a AAI3670762
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Morris, Deborah Eileen. $3 3181087
245 1 0 $a Reconsidering teacher commentary as interactive and collaborative dialogue: Implications for student writing and revising.
300 $a 340 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-05(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Lee Nickoson.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Bowling Green State University, 2014.
520 $a This dissertation focuses on teacher commentary as formative assessment and as collaborative dialogue that actively engages both teacher and student writers in conversations about the writing. Student voices are emphasized throughout this teacher research study of two classes at a Midwestern community college, a study that explores what the FYC student writers want and value in teacher commentary as they write and revise. With a particular research project acting as the contextual "center" of the dialogue, multiple data collection instruments were employed, including: student-generated texts and self-assessments, pre-and post-project questionnaires, personal interviews, and personal observations and reflections from teacher and students. Analysis of this data draws upon feminist theory, grounded theory and an ethnographic perspective to discover, describe, and assess the multiple and varied contexts surrounding student writing and revising as well as student values within these complex contexts. I argue that students do value the collaborative dialogue, interactions and formative assessment found in commentary that gives the students a voice in their own writing and revising, and I further argue that this intentional and rhetorical response to student writing sends a powerful message to those student writers about what we in the field of Rhetoric and Composition truly value in writing.
590 $a School code: 0018.
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
650 4 $a Community college education. $3 2122836
690 $a 0535
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0456
690 $a 0275
710 2 $a Bowling Green State University. $b English (Rhetoric and Writing) PhD. $3 3181088
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-05A(E).
790 $a 0018
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3670762