東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Trendsetters Vs. Agenda Setting: A C...

Almistadi, Mohammed Ibrahim.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Trendsetters Vs. Agenda Setting: A Comparison of Agendas in Twitter and Newspapers of Saudi Arabia.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Trendsetters Vs. Agenda Setting: A Comparison of Agendas in Twitter and Newspapers of Saudi Arabia./
Author:	Almistadi, Mohammed Ibrahim.
Description:	94 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 53-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International53-03(E).
Subject:	Mass communication. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1561185
ISBN:	9781321060461

Trendsetters Vs. Agenda Setting: A Comparison of Agendas in Twitter and Newspapers of Saudi Arabia.
Almistadi, Mohammed Ibrahim.

Trendsetters Vs. Agenda Setting: A Comparison of Agendas in Twitter and Newspapers of Saudi Arabia. - 94 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 53-03.

Thesis (M.S.M.C.)--Arkansas State University, 2014.

This study was designed to examine the agenda of traditional newspapers of Saudi Arabia and the agenda of Saudi Twitter users, and to compare between the two agendas. The salient issues in both traditional Saudi newspapers articles and tweets by Saudi users had to be content analyzed to accomplish the study's goal. The top three Saudi newspapers in circulation were chosen to draw the article sample, and a list of fourteen Saudi Twitter accounts were chosen based on how often their tweets got retweeted. The users whose tweets got the highest retweets were selected for analysis. The findings showed that the top five salient topics of issues in newspapers of Saudi Arabia were foreign affairs, civil defense, culture and media, labor, and justice. On the other hand, the top five topics of issues in tweets were social affairs, Islamic affairs, culture and media, terrorism, corruption. Findings showed that there was a weak but significant correlation between the agenda of Saudi newspapers and the agenda of Saudi Twitter users. Results supported previous studies by showing that religious communication in social media was high for Saudi Arabian users, and that a social movement existed in Twitter as Saudi users were working on raising the awareness toward corruption by heavily retweeting tweets that discuss the topic of corruption.

ISBN: 9781321060461Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144804
Mass communication.

Trendsetters Vs. Agenda Setting: A Comparison of Agendas in Twitter and Newspapers of Saudi Arabia.
LDR:02219nmm a2200277 4500 001 2065020
005 20151128133620.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321060461
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1561185
035 $a AAI1561185
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Almistadi, Mohammed Ibrahim. $3 3179680
245 1 0 $a Trendsetters Vs. Agenda Setting: A Comparison of Agendas in Twitter and Newspapers of Saudi Arabia.
300 $a 94 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 53-03.
500 $a Adviser: Mary J. Pitts.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.M.C.)--Arkansas State University, 2014.
520 $a This study was designed to examine the agenda of traditional newspapers of Saudi Arabia and the agenda of Saudi Twitter users, and to compare between the two agendas. The salient issues in both traditional Saudi newspapers articles and tweets by Saudi users had to be content analyzed to accomplish the study's goal. The top three Saudi newspapers in circulation were chosen to draw the article sample, and a list of fourteen Saudi Twitter accounts were chosen based on how often their tweets got retweeted. The users whose tweets got the highest retweets were selected for analysis. The findings showed that the top five salient topics of issues in newspapers of Saudi Arabia were foreign affairs, civil defense, culture and media, labor, and justice. On the other hand, the top five topics of issues in tweets were social affairs, Islamic affairs, culture and media, terrorism, corruption. Findings showed that there was a weak but significant correlation between the agenda of Saudi newspapers and the agenda of Saudi Twitter users. Results supported previous studies by showing that religious communication in social media was high for Saudi Arabian users, and that a social movement existed in Twitter as Saudi users were working on raising the awareness toward corruption by heavily retweeting tweets that discuss the topic of corruption.
590 $a School code: 1231.
650 4 $a Mass communication. $3 2144804
650 4 $a Journalism. $3 576107
690 $a 0708
690 $a 0391
710 2 $a Arkansas State University. $b Journalism. $3 3179681
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 53-03(E).
790 $a 1231
791 $a M.S.M.C.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1561185