東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Wo liegt die Grenze? Aspekt, Aktions...

Gallmeier, Maria.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Wo liegt die Grenze? Aspekt, Aktionsart und verwandte Phanomene in der Erforschung der deutschen Sprache.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Wo liegt die Grenze? Aspekt, Aktionsart und verwandte Phanomene in der Erforschung der deutschen Sprache./
Author:	Gallmeier, Maria.
Description:	313 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-10, Section: A, page: 3625.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-10A.
Subject:	Language, Linguistics. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3193593
ISBN:	9780542378645

Wo liegt die Grenze? Aspekt, Aktionsart und verwandte Phanomene in der Erforschung der deutschen Sprache.
Gallmeier, Maria.

Wo liegt die Grenze? Aspekt, Aktionsart und verwandte Phanomene in der Erforschung der deutschen Sprache. - 313 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-10, Section: A, page: 3625.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Tennessee, 2005.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

In 1824, Jacob Grimm first used the terms perfective and imperfective to describe the German verbal system and initiated the discussion of the aspecto-actional meaning in such pairs as jagen : erjagen. Since then, German research has frequently failed to define aspectological terms and categories unambiguously.

ISBN: 9780542378645Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018079
Language, Linguistics.

Wo liegt die Grenze? Aspekt, Aktionsart und verwandte Phanomene in der Erforschung der deutschen Sprache.
LDR:03744nmm a2200349 4500 001 2057817
005 20150622091120.5
008 170521s2005 ||||||||||||||||| ||ger d
020 $a 9780542378645
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3193593
035 $a AAI3193593
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Gallmeier, Maria. $3 3171700
245 1 0 $a Wo liegt die Grenze? Aspekt, Aktionsart und verwandte Phanomene in der Erforschung der deutschen Sprache.
300 $a 313 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-10, Section: A, page: 3625.
500 $a Major Professor: Chauncey J. Mellor.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Tennessee, 2005.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a In 1824, Jacob Grimm first used the terms perfective and imperfective to describe the German verbal system and initiated the discussion of the aspecto-actional meaning in such pairs as jagen : erjagen. Since then, German research has frequently failed to define aspectological terms and categories unambiguously.
520 $a This study examines the status of German aspectological research, with special reference to the boundary between the categories Aspekt and Aktionsart. For background, this dissertation successively examines early German aspectological research (1824 to 1930), landmark German grammars, German aspectological research since 1970, cross-linguistic aspectological research in the Slavic and Anglo-American traditions with regard to these terms and categories.
520 $a This permits clear identification of the most frequent definitional problems in German aspectology: (a) confusing application of the category pairs perfectivity vs. imperfectivity and terminativity vs. aterminativity; (b) restriction of the term grammatischer Aspekt to Slavic aspect; (c) differentiation of Aspekt and Aktionsart only by the degree of grammaticalization vs. lexicalization; (d) failure to restrict Aktionsart to a specific level of representation, e.g. morphology.
520 $a Some resulting terminological problems are: (1) the use of term Aspekt indiscriminately to denote three grammatical categories, aspect, the semantic category, perfectivity, and the semantic category, aspectuality; (2) the use of the term Aktionsart to denote: (a) semantic groups of verbs, (b) the lexico-grammatical verbal classes, (c) the semantic category, terminativity, and (d) the semantic category, aspectuality; (3) the use of the term Aktionsart to denote simultaneously the actional classes of verbs and morphologically marked and unmarked semantic groups of verbs, such as ingressive, inchoative etc.; (4) plethora of terms for the opposition terminative vs. aterminative; (5) unjustified use of the terms perfective vs. imperfective in the description of the German verbs.
520 $a Based on the results of this analysis, unambiguous definitions and internationally acceptable terminology for the major aspectogical categories are suggested. Four factors are essential for this: (I) distinguishing aspectual, actional and temporal categories within the functional-semantic domain of aspectotemporality; (II) distinguishing between aspectual and actional meanings; (III) distinguishing aspectual and actional meanings from their means of expression; (IV) distinguishing between Aspekt, Aktionalklassen and Aktionsarten on the level of expression.
590 $a School code: 0226.
650 4 $a Language, Linguistics. $3 1018079
650 4 $a Language, Modern. $3 1018098
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0291
710 2 $a The University of Tennessee. $3 1022026
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-10A.
790 $a 0226
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
793 $a German
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3193593