東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

A case study of the impact of a syte...

Kromrei, Heidi T.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A case study of the impact of a sytematic evaluation process in a graduate medical education residency program.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	A case study of the impact of a sytematic evaluation process in a graduate medical education residency program./
Author:	Kromrei, Heidi T.
Description:	131 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-08A(E).
Subject:	Education, Evaluation. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3619046
ISBN:	9781303877193

A case study of the impact of a sytematic evaluation process in a graduate medical education residency program.
Kromrei, Heidi T.

A case study of the impact of a sytematic evaluation process in a graduate medical education residency program. - 131 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wayne State University, 2014.

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has charged institutions that sponsor accredited Graduate Medical Education programs (residency and fellowship specialty programs) with overseeing implementation of mandatory annual program evaluation efforts to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Physicians receive scant, if any, training in program evaluation methodology. Human Performance Technology (HPT) offers models suitable for residency program evaluation as well as trained evaluators who are experts in evaluation. Leaders in the field of HPT have called for empirical studies to examine the impact of HPT models in a variety of contexts.

ISBN: 9781303877193Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669638
Education, Evaluation.

A case study of the impact of a sytematic evaluation process in a graduate medical education residency program.
LDR:02776nmm a2200289 4500 001 2055230
005 20141112080406.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303877193
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3619046
035 $a AAI3619046
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kromrei, Heidi T. $3 3168866
245 1 2 $a A case study of the impact of a sytematic evaluation process in a graduate medical education residency program.
300 $a 131 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Ingrid Guerra-Lopez.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wayne State University, 2014.
520 $a The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has charged institutions that sponsor accredited Graduate Medical Education programs (residency and fellowship specialty programs) with overseeing implementation of mandatory annual program evaluation efforts to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Physicians receive scant, if any, training in program evaluation methodology. Human Performance Technology (HPT) offers models suitable for residency program evaluation as well as trained evaluators who are experts in evaluation. Leaders in the field of HPT have called for empirical studies to examine the impact of HPT models in a variety of contexts.
520 $a This single case study examined the impact of using a systematic evaluation process, the "Impact Evaluation Process," (Guerra-Lopez, 2007b, 2007c; Guerra-Lopez, 2008), as a means for annual program evaluation in an ophthalmology residency program sponsored by large healthcare institution in the Midwest. Outcome data from 2011, 2012, and 2013 (the years in which the "Impact Evaluation Process," was utilized), was analyzed and compared to prior years evaluation efforts. Surveys with residency program stakeholders were conducted in 2011 and 2013. Results indicate that the number of recommendations for program improvement, types of recommendations and completed recommended actions increased in years that the systematic evaluation process was implemented. Recommendations generated using the systematic evaluation process were actionable (specific and measurable) and aligned to program deficits. Some program outcomes improved during the three years of systematic evaluation process implementation, while one performance outcome declined during this time. Stakeholder perceptions about the process indicated that anticipated and realized benefits of the process differed.
590 $a School code: 0254.
650 4 $a Education, Evaluation. $3 1669638
650 4 $a Education, Health. $3 1017668
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0680
710 2 $a Wayne State University. $b Instructional Technology. $3 1022237
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-08A(E).
790 $a 0254
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3619046