東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The direct impact of team cohesivene...

Palmer, Mary E.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The direct impact of team cohesiveness and athletes' perception of coaching leadership functions on team success in NCAA Division I Women's basketball.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The direct impact of team cohesiveness and athletes' perception of coaching leadership functions on team success in NCAA Division I Women's basketball./
Author:	Palmer, Mary E.
Description:	126 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-04A(E).
Subject:	Business Administration, Sports Management. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3608392
ISBN:	9781303664670

The direct impact of team cohesiveness and athletes' perception of coaching leadership functions on team success in NCAA Division I Women's basketball.
Palmer, Mary E.

The direct impact of team cohesiveness and athletes' perception of coaching leadership functions on team success in NCAA Division I Women's basketball. - 126 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Texas Woman's University, 2013.

This study investigated the direct impact of team cohesiveness and student-athletes' perceptions of coaching behavior/leadership functions on the success of NCAA Division I Women's basketball, based on the teams' win/loss records. The research collection was quantitative in nature. Statistical design and analysis provided justification for the use of the paired comparison instrument coupled with other meta-analytic assessments to determine construct validity for all measures addressed in the study. The researcher formulated six questions regarding athletes' perceptions of team cohesiveness and coaching leadership functions. To answer these questions, the researcher administered two survey instruments: the Lowry Leadership Functions Instrument (LFI), and the Lencioni Team Assessment (LTA) questionnaire. The demographic findings gave a snapshot of a typical women's college basketball student-athlete (N=73) specific to the region and conference. The institutions were located in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas. The data from the LFI showed that players from winning and losing teams selected the same top and bottom leadership functions in their coaches, but there were differences in how winning teams and losing teams rated those functions. The top-rated coaching/leadership functions were attempting to keep communication channels open (70.81%), keeping members focused on goals (69.76%), and providing encouragement (65.44%). The LTA focused on five indicators of team cohesion (Trust, Healthy Conflict, Commitment, Accountability, Focus on Results) and those behaviors within each function, and showed differences in perceptions on team cohesiveness between winning and losing teams. While there was no conclusive data from the LTA on the effects of winning and losing on demographics and team functionality, five areas of note emerged: a) athletes on losing teams had more trust issues than athletes on winning teams, b) there was a major shift in minority perception of influence over a forty year span between the Lowry (1972) and the Palmer (2012) studies, c) winning teams tended to focus on behaviors that produced quantifiable results, d) losing teams appeared to be more focused on collective results, and e) behaviors involved in achieving a winning outcome may be more important than the outcome itself.

ISBN: 9781303664670Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669318
Business Administration, Sports Management.

The direct impact of team cohesiveness and athletes' perception of coaching leadership functions on team success in NCAA Division I Women's basketball.
LDR:03432nam a2200325 4500 001 1964279
005 20141015113826.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303664670
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3608392
035 $a AAI3608392
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Palmer, Mary E. $3 2100694
245 1 4 $a The direct impact of team cohesiveness and athletes' perception of coaching leadership functions on team success in NCAA Division I Women's basketball.
300 $a 126 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Bettye Myers.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Texas Woman's University, 2013.
520 $a This study investigated the direct impact of team cohesiveness and student-athletes' perceptions of coaching behavior/leadership functions on the success of NCAA Division I Women's basketball, based on the teams' win/loss records. The research collection was quantitative in nature. Statistical design and analysis provided justification for the use of the paired comparison instrument coupled with other meta-analytic assessments to determine construct validity for all measures addressed in the study. The researcher formulated six questions regarding athletes' perceptions of team cohesiveness and coaching leadership functions. To answer these questions, the researcher administered two survey instruments: the Lowry Leadership Functions Instrument (LFI), and the Lencioni Team Assessment (LTA) questionnaire. The demographic findings gave a snapshot of a typical women's college basketball student-athlete (N=73) specific to the region and conference. The institutions were located in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas. The data from the LFI showed that players from winning and losing teams selected the same top and bottom leadership functions in their coaches, but there were differences in how winning teams and losing teams rated those functions. The top-rated coaching/leadership functions were attempting to keep communication channels open (70.81%), keeping members focused on goals (69.76%), and providing encouragement (65.44%). The LTA focused on five indicators of team cohesion (Trust, Healthy Conflict, Commitment, Accountability, Focus on Results) and those behaviors within each function, and showed differences in perceptions on team cohesiveness between winning and losing teams. While there was no conclusive data from the LTA on the effects of winning and losing on demographics and team functionality, five areas of note emerged: a) athletes on losing teams had more trust issues than athletes on winning teams, b) there was a major shift in minority perception of influence over a forty year span between the Lowry (1972) and the Palmer (2012) studies, c) winning teams tended to focus on behaviors that produced quantifiable results, d) losing teams appeared to be more focused on collective results, and e) behaviors involved in achieving a winning outcome may be more important than the outcome itself.
520 $a Keywords: LTA, LFI, Cohesiveness, Functionality, Student-athlete.
590 $a School code: 0925.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Sports Management. $3 1669318
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Education, Teacher Training. $3 783747
650 4 $a Education, Physical. $3 1018000
650 4 $a Recreation. $3 535376
690 $a 0430
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0530
690 $a 0523
690 $a 0814
710 2 $a Texas Woman's University. $b Kinesiology. $3 2100695
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-04A(E).
790 $a 0925
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3608392