東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Reconciling the collective agreement...

Neumayer, Susan Anne.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Reconciling the collective agreement with human rights obligations: An analysis of arbitral decisions on seniority rights and the duty to accommodate disabled employees.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Reconciling the collective agreement with human rights obligations: An analysis of arbitral decisions on seniority rights and the duty to accommodate disabled employees./
Author:	Neumayer, Susan Anne.
Description:	91 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-03, page: 0809.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International42-03.
Subject:	Law. -
Online resource:	http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/MQ84356
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MQ84356
ISBN:	0612843564

Reconciling the collective agreement with human rights obligations: An analysis of arbitral decisions on seniority rights and the duty to accommodate disabled employees.
Neumayer, Susan Anne.

Reconciling the collective agreement with human rights obligations: An analysis of arbitral decisions on seniority rights and the duty to accommodate disabled employees. - 91 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-03, page: 0809.

Thesis (LL.M.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2003.

Recent statutory and judicial developments have given labour arbitrators increased jurisdiction to interpret and apply human rights law in the unionized workplace. How are labour arbitrators exercising this jurisdiction given the potentially fundamental difference in the values underlying the labour relations and human rights regimes? In this paper I describe how the two regimes conflict in the context where a disabled employee needs an accommodation which results in a violation of a seniority provision under a collective agreement. I review the recent arbitral jurisprudence in this area and I examine how arbitrators have resolved the conflict between seniority rights and the duty to accommodate. I conclude that the majority of arbitrators are taking a principled approach in resolving this conflict and, for the most part, they are overriding seniority provisions to permit accommodations where it is equitable to do so.

ISBN: 0612843564Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

Reconciling the collective agreement with human rights obligations: An analysis of arbitral decisions on seniority rights and the duty to accommodate disabled employees.
LDR:01877nmm 2200265 4500 001 1866493
005 20050105135828.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
020 $a 0612843564
035 $a (UnM)AAIMQ84356
035 $a AAIMQ84356
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Neumayer, Susan Anne. $3 1953876
245 1 0 $a Reconciling the collective agreement with human rights obligations: An analysis of arbitral decisions on seniority rights and the duty to accommodate disabled employees.
300 $a 91 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-03, page: 0809.
502 $a Thesis (LL.M.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2003.
520 $a Recent statutory and judicial developments have given labour arbitrators increased jurisdiction to interpret and apply human rights law in the unionized workplace. How are labour arbitrators exercising this jurisdiction given the potentially fundamental difference in the values underlying the labour relations and human rights regimes? In this paper I describe how the two regimes conflict in the context where a disabled employee needs an accommodation which results in a violation of a seniority provision under a collective agreement. I review the recent arbitral jurisprudence in this area and I examine how arbitrators have resolved the conflict between seniority rights and the duty to accommodate. I conclude that the majority of arbitrators are taking a principled approach in resolving this conflict and, for the most part, they are overriding seniority provisions to permit accommodations where it is equitable to do so.
590 $a School code: 0779.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Sociology, Industrial and Labor Relations. $3 1017858
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0629
710 2 0 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $3 1017674
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 42-03.
790 $a 0779
791 $a LL.M.
792 $a 2003
856 $u http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/MQ84356
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MQ84356