東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Group emotional intelligence: The r...

Hamme, Christina L.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Group emotional intelligence: The research and development of an assessment instrument.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Group emotional intelligence: The research and development of an assessment instrument./
Author:	Hamme, Christina L.
Description:	77 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-09, Section: B, page: 4663.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-09B.
Subject:	Psychology, Industrial. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3106391

Group emotional intelligence: The research and development of an assessment instrument.
Hamme, Christina L.

Group emotional intelligence: The research and development of an assessment instrument. - 77 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-09, Section: B, page: 4663.

Thesis (Psy.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, 2003.

Studies of Emotional Intelligence have been limited to the individual level of analysis, yet the literature shows that group dynamics play a crucial role in group performance and effectiveness. In this study, an assessment instrument to measure group Emotional Intelligence as conceptualized by Druskat and Wolff (2000) was developed. The instrument and four subscales of Hemphill's (1956) Group Dimensions Description Questionnaire were administered to a total of 167 people from groups in business organizations in the Eastern and Midwestern United States. Coefficient Alpha was calculated for each of the 13 subscales on the Group El instrument to assess reliability and scores on the four subscales of the Group Dimensions Description Questionnaire (intimacy, control, viscidity and hedonic tone) were compared with the Group EI subscales to determine convergent and divergent validity. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on the data in an effort to confirm the 6 dimensions proposed by Druskat and Wolff (2000) as underlying the 13 subscales. Eight of the 13 original subscales were found to be reliable. Building relationships and ambassadorial orientation, and team self-evaluation and seeking feedback were combined to form two additional subscales with Coefficient Alphas over .8, for a total of 10 reliable subscales. Convergent and divergent validity emerged as expected. Five of the six dimensions proposed in Druskat & Wolff's (2000) theory as underlying the subscales were confirmed: group regulation of members, group self-awareness, group self-regulation, group social awareness, and group social skills. Suggestions for further study and application are made.Subjects--Topical Terms:

520063
Psychology, Industrial.

Group emotional intelligence: The research and development of an assessment instrument.
LDR:02655nmm 2200277 4500 001 1865846
005 20041220102522.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3106391
035 $a AAI3106391
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Hamme, Christina L. $3 1953271
245 1 0 $a Group emotional intelligence: The research and development of an assessment instrument.
300 $a 77 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-09, Section: B, page: 4663.
500 $a Chairperson: Cary Cherniss.
502 $a Thesis (Psy.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, 2003.
520 $a Studies of Emotional Intelligence have been limited to the individual level of analysis, yet the literature shows that group dynamics play a crucial role in group performance and effectiveness. In this study, an assessment instrument to measure group Emotional Intelligence as conceptualized by Druskat and Wolff (2000) was developed. The instrument and four subscales of Hemphill's (1956) Group Dimensions Description Questionnaire were administered to a total of 167 people from groups in business organizations in the Eastern and Midwestern United States. Coefficient Alpha was calculated for each of the 13 subscales on the Group El instrument to assess reliability and scores on the four subscales of the Group Dimensions Description Questionnaire (intimacy, control, viscidity and hedonic tone) were compared with the Group EI subscales to determine convergent and divergent validity. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on the data in an effort to confirm the 6 dimensions proposed by Druskat and Wolff (2000) as underlying the 13 subscales. Eight of the 13 original subscales were found to be reliable. Building relationships and ambassadorial orientation, and team self-evaluation and seeking feedback were combined to form two additional subscales with Coefficient Alphas over .8, for a total of 10 reliable subscales. Convergent and divergent validity emerged as expected. Five of the six dimensions proposed in Druskat & Wolff's (2000) theory as underlying the subscales were confirmed: group regulation of members, group self-awareness, group self-regulation, group social awareness, and group social skills. Suggestions for further study and application are made.
590 $a School code: 0542.
650 4 $a Psychology, Industrial. $3 520063
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
690 $a 0624
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0632
710 2 0 $a Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology. $3 1022585
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-09B.
790 1 0 $a Cherniss, Cary, $e advisor
790 $a 0542
791 $a Psy.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3106391