東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Epistemology, ontology, and semantic...

Theodorou, Stephanie.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Epistemology, ontology, and semantics: A critique of Paul Ricoeur's theory of metaphor.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Epistemology, ontology, and semantics: A critique of Paul Ricoeur's theory of metaphor./
Author:	Theodorou, Stephanie.
Description:	240 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 59-07, Section: A, page: 2565.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International59-07A.
Subject:	Religion, Philosophy of. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9838539
ISBN:	0591922134

Epistemology, ontology, and semantics: A critique of Paul Ricoeur's theory of metaphor.
Theodorou, Stephanie.

Epistemology, ontology, and semantics: A critique of Paul Ricoeur's theory of metaphor. - 240 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 59-07, Section: A, page: 2565.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Temple University, 1998.

This dissertation will examine the relationship between epistemological questions and the testimonial or proclamatory nature of religious belief based in Paul Ricoeur's linking of metaphor to "the hermeneutics of imagination." My argument is built around the issue of sense and reference in religious language; we can say along hermeneutic lines that religious symbols and narratives have an internal structure which "reconfigures" the real, but we must also ask "what exactly is disclosed in this process?" In forming a potential answer to this question, I analyze the historical and thematic issues which have shaped our understanding of metaphor. This involves an examination of philosophical and epistemological arguments surrounding the relation of ontology to language, schema, and cognition in Aristotle, Kant, Heidegger, and Hegel as they correlate to Paul Ricoeur's thesis. I focus on how the representational and referential function of religious concepts can be developed in a way which avoids strict coherentism. In my view, we can say that there is a qualified need to allow for a form of linguistic reference which takes into account some epistemological considerations.

ISBN: 0591922134Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017774
Religion, Philosophy of.

Epistemology, ontology, and semantics: A critique of Paul Ricoeur's theory of metaphor.
LDR:03041nmm 2200313 4500 001 1850749
005 20051205112318.5
008 130614s1998 eng d
020 $a 0591922134
035 $a (UnM)AAI9838539
035 $a AAI9838539
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Theodorou, Stephanie. $3 1938659
245 1 0 $a Epistemology, ontology, and semantics: A critique of Paul Ricoeur's theory of metaphor.
300 $a 240 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 59-07, Section: A, page: 2565.
500 $a Major Adviser: Thomas Dean.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Temple University, 1998.
520 $a This dissertation will examine the relationship between epistemological questions and the testimonial or proclamatory nature of religious belief based in Paul Ricoeur's linking of metaphor to "the hermeneutics of imagination." My argument is built around the issue of sense and reference in religious language; we can say along hermeneutic lines that religious symbols and narratives have an internal structure which "reconfigures" the real, but we must also ask "what exactly is disclosed in this process?" In forming a potential answer to this question, I analyze the historical and thematic issues which have shaped our understanding of metaphor. This involves an examination of philosophical and epistemological arguments surrounding the relation of ontology to language, schema, and cognition in Aristotle, Kant, Heidegger, and Hegel as they correlate to Paul Ricoeur's thesis. I focus on how the representational and referential function of religious concepts can be developed in a way which avoids strict coherentism. In my view, we can say that there is a qualified need to allow for a form of linguistic reference which takes into account some epistemological considerations.
520 $a Drawing from Hilary Putnam and Susan Haack, I describe this moderate view of reference as based on "internal realism." We are not entirely bound by natural description or ontological forms of disclosure, but we can locate ourselves somewhere between these kinds of experience. I develop this linking of two modes in terms of cognitive-psychological processes which occur through the acquisition of analogical and metaphoric schemes.
520 $a This study concludes with a critique of Ricoeur's use of metaphor as the basis for religious reconfiguration. His analysis of the metaphoric function, in this context, eradicates the epistemic functions of language and leads to a position which is purely linguistic and contextual. I believe an analysis of lower-level analogies allows us to make a criticism of his view. We may then open a way to look at a different version of the representational aspects of religious discourse.
590 $a School code: 0225.
650 4 $a Religion, Philosophy of. $3 1017774
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Language, General. $3 1018089
690 $a 0322
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0679
710 2 0 $a Temple University. $3 959342
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 59-07A.
790 1 0 $a Dean, Thomas, $e advisor
790 $a 0225
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1998
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9838539