東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The reliability and validity assessm...

Gross, Arianne.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The reliability and validity assessment of the Anger Attacks Questionnaire.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The reliability and validity assessment of the Anger Attacks Questionnaire./
Author:	Gross, Arianne.
Description:	90 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 43-01, page: 0323.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International43-01.
Subject:	Psychology, Clinical. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1420832
ISBN:	0496255800

The reliability and validity assessment of the Anger Attacks Questionnaire.
Gross, Arianne.

The reliability and validity assessment of the Anger Attacks Questionnaire. - 90 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 43-01, page: 0323.

Thesis (M.A.)--California State University, Fresno, 2004.

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Anger Attacks Questionnaire (AAQ). The AAQ was designed to screen for problematic anger. Seventy-eight participants were recruited from an undergraduate introduction to psychology subject pool. The reliability of the AAQ was assessed using the test-retest method at a 2-week interval. The validity of the AAQ was assessed via score correlations with the Trait Anger Scale (TAS), and the Anger Episodes Reporting Instrument (AERI). The TAS was designed to screen for trait anger and the AERI was designed for individuals to report their anger episodes. Results indicated that the AAQ anger attack scores are reliable. There was a small, yet significant correlation between the AAQ and the TAS, indicating that the AAQ may be valid. Some of the correlations between the AAQ scores and the AERI scores were significant, yet others were insignificant.

ISBN: 0496255800Subjects--Topical Terms:

524864
Psychology, Clinical.

The reliability and validity assessment of the Anger Attacks Questionnaire.
LDR:01836nmm 2200289 4500 001 1849646
005 20051203080724.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
020 $a 0496255800
035 $a (UnM)AAI1420832
035 $a AAI1420832
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Gross, Arianne. $3 1937596
245 1 4 $a The reliability and validity assessment of the Anger Attacks Questionnaire.
300 $a 90 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 43-01, page: 0323.
500 $a Chair: Christine B. Edmondson.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--California State University, Fresno, 2004.
520 $a The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Anger Attacks Questionnaire (AAQ). The AAQ was designed to screen for problematic anger. Seventy-eight participants were recruited from an undergraduate introduction to psychology subject pool. The reliability of the AAQ was assessed using the test-retest method at a 2-week interval. The validity of the AAQ was assessed via score correlations with the Trait Anger Scale (TAS), and the Anger Episodes Reporting Instrument (AERI). The TAS was designed to screen for trait anger and the AERI was designed for individuals to report their anger episodes. Results indicated that the AAQ anger attack scores are reliable. There was a small, yet significant correlation between the AAQ and the TAS, indicating that the AAQ may be valid. Some of the correlations between the AAQ scores and the AERI scores were significant, yet others were insignificant.
590 $a School code: 6050.
650 4 $a Psychology, Clinical. $3 524864
650 4 $a Psychology, Behavioral. $3 1017677
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0632
710 2 0 $a California State University, Fresno. $3 1017612
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 43-01.
790 1 0 $a Edmondson, Christine B., $e advisor
790 $a 6050
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1420832