東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Making foreign policy: Presidential ...

Mitchell, David.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Making foreign policy: Presidential management, advisors and the foreign policy decision-making process.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Making foreign policy: Presidential management, advisors and the foreign policy decision-making process./
作者:	Mitchell, David.
面頁冊數:	324 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-09, Section: A, page: 3557.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International65-09A.
標題:	Political Science, International Law and Relations. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3149052
ISBN:	0496084690

Making foreign policy: Presidential management, advisors and the foreign policy decision-making process.
Mitchell, David.

Making foreign policy: Presidential management, advisors and the foreign policy decision-making process. - 324 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-09, Section: A, page: 3557.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Syracuse University, 2004.

Presidents play a critical role in the formulation of United States foreign policy, however the presidential studies literature and foreign policy analysis literature arrive at very different conclusion regarding how presidents influence the policy process and both are often inaccurate. This study develops an Advisory Theory of Decision-Making to address how presidents influence the decision-making process and, as a consequence, overcome the deficiencies of both the presidential studies and foreign policy literature's. This study argues that four different types of decision-making processes are produced by a president's choice of advisory structure and level of centralization. In addition, the study identifies "unstructured solutions" that indicate how the advisors and president choose to resolve disagreements over policy deliberations, thereby providing an indication of the decision outcome. The identified decision-making processes and their associated decision outcomes are examined using four cases of decision-making on security policy drawn from the Nixon (Vietnam War), Carter (Strategic Arms Limitation Talks II), Reagan (Strategic Arms Reduction Talks I), and Clinton (Bosnia conflict) administrations. The case studies are constructed using the method of Structured-Focused Comparisons, in which a set of theoretically based questions and anticipated observations to those questions are developed in order to guide the research and allow for comparison of decision-making within and between cases.

ISBN: 0496084690Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017399
Political Science, International Law and Relations.

Making foreign policy: Presidential management, advisors and the foreign policy decision-making process.
LDR:02453nmm 2200289 4500 001 1841906
005 20050915142443.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
020 $a 0496084690
035 $a (UnM)AAI3149052
035 $a AAI3149052
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Mitchell, David. $3 582947
245 1 0 $a Making foreign policy: Presidential management, advisors and the foreign policy decision-making process.
300 $a 324 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-09, Section: A, page: 3557.
500 $a Adviser: Margaret Hermann.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Syracuse University, 2004.
520 $a Presidents play a critical role in the formulation of United States foreign policy, however the presidential studies literature and foreign policy analysis literature arrive at very different conclusion regarding how presidents influence the policy process and both are often inaccurate. This study develops an Advisory Theory of Decision-Making to address how presidents influence the decision-making process and, as a consequence, overcome the deficiencies of both the presidential studies and foreign policy literature's. This study argues that four different types of decision-making processes are produced by a president's choice of advisory structure and level of centralization. In addition, the study identifies "unstructured solutions" that indicate how the advisors and president choose to resolve disagreements over policy deliberations, thereby providing an indication of the decision outcome. The identified decision-making processes and their associated decision outcomes are examined using four cases of decision-making on security policy drawn from the Nixon (Vietnam War), Carter (Strategic Arms Limitation Talks II), Reagan (Strategic Arms Reduction Talks I), and Clinton (Bosnia conflict) administrations. The case studies are constructed using the method of Structured-Focused Comparisons, in which a set of theoretically based questions and anticipated observations to those questions are developed in order to guide the research and allow for comparison of decision-making within and between cases.
590 $a School code: 0659.
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 1017399
650 4 $a Political Science, Public Administration. $3 1017438
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
690 $a 0616
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0615
710 2 0 $a Syracuse University. $3 1017440
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 65-09A.
790 1 0 $a Hermann, Margaret, $e advisor
790 $a 0659
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3149052