東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Goal orientation and perceived contr...

Watson, William Allen.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Goal orientation and perceived contributions as predictors of team members' overall responses to team-based rewards for team success versus no team-based rewards for team failure.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Goal orientation and perceived contributions as predictors of team members' overall responses to team-based rewards for team success versus no team-based rewards for team failure./
Author:	Watson, William Allen.
Description:	124 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-03, Section: A, page: 0807.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International65-03A.
Subject:	Education, Business. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3126684
ISBN:	0496739631

Goal orientation and perceived contributions as predictors of team members' overall responses to team-based rewards for team success versus no team-based rewards for team failure.
Watson, William Allen.

Goal orientation and perceived contributions as predictors of team members' overall responses to team-based rewards for team success versus no team-based rewards for team failure. - 124 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-03, Section: A, page: 0807.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Southern Mississippi, 2003.

Watson (2002) found that participants exerted different levels of task effort in response to receiving (or not receiving) a team-based reward (TBR) based on their team's overall success (or overall failure) when TBRs were administered in conjunction with feedback regarding their perceived contributions toward previous team task performance. The overall purpose of this study was to determine why participants in Watson's (2002) study exhibited these responses by reanalyzing these findings in conjunction with responses to several other experimental measures that Watson (2002) collected but did not report. Specifically, the first objective of this study was to determine if Watson's (2002) experimental manipulations differentially impacted participants' attitudinal and/or affective states. The second objective was to determine if any of these states mediated the TBR x feedback interaction on performance change reported by Watson (2002). The third objective was to determine if goal orientation moderated any of these relationships.

ISBN: 0496739631Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017515
Education, Business.

Goal orientation and perceived contributions as predictors of team members' overall responses to team-based rewards for team success versus no team-based rewards for team failure.
LDR:03481nmm 2200289 4500 001 1841639
005 20050915140257.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
020 $a 0496739631
035 $a (UnM)AAI3126684
035 $a AAI3126684
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Watson, William Allen. $3 1929926
245 1 0 $a Goal orientation and perceived contributions as predictors of team members' overall responses to team-based rewards for team success versus no team-based rewards for team failure.
300 $a 124 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-03, Section: A, page: 0807.
500 $a Director: Vincent J. Fortunato.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Southern Mississippi, 2003.
520 $a Watson (2002) found that participants exerted different levels of task effort in response to receiving (or not receiving) a team-based reward (TBR) based on their team's overall success (or overall failure) when TBRs were administered in conjunction with feedback regarding their perceived contributions toward previous team task performance. The overall purpose of this study was to determine why participants in Watson's (2002) study exhibited these responses by reanalyzing these findings in conjunction with responses to several other experimental measures that Watson (2002) collected but did not report. Specifically, the first objective of this study was to determine if Watson's (2002) experimental manipulations differentially impacted participants' attitudinal and/or affective states. The second objective was to determine if any of these states mediated the TBR x feedback interaction on performance change reported by Watson (2002). The third objective was to determine if goal orientation moderated any of these relationships.
520 $a Results of this study indicated that the allocation of TBRs in conjunction with performance feedback did indeed differentially influence participants' attitudinal and affective states. Specifically, results indicated a main effect for TBR on team viability and positive mood, and learning and performance goal orientations interacted with the allocation of TBRs and feedback to influence participants' perceptions of distributive justice and team commitment. Results did not, however, indicate why participants in Watson's (2002) study exerted different levels of task effort. In addition, none of the attitudinal or affective constructs investigated mediated the aforementioned TBR x feedback interaction on performance change, and goal orientation did not moderate this relationship.
520 $a In conclusion, overall findings from both this study and Watson's (2002) study provide preliminary empirical evidence that work team members exert different (and sometimes contradictory) behavioral and non-behavioral responses to the allocation of TBRs in settings in which they are made aware of their own levels of team task performance relative to those of their teammates. Findings from this study in particular indicate that individuals' levels of goal orientation influence many of these responses. As both of these studies were largely exploratory, future research aimed at extending these lines of research is warranted.
590 $a School code: 0211.
650 4 $a Education, Business. $3 1017515
690 $a 0688
710 2 0 $a The University of Southern Mississippi. $3 1018511
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 65-03A.
790 1 0 $a Fortunato, Vincent J., $e advisor
790 $a 0211
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3126684