東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Relative resource strengths, relativ...

Sirmon, David Gary.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Relative resource strengths, relative resource weaknesses and strategy: Exploring the performance effects of resource portfolios.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Relative resource strengths, relative resource weaknesses and strategy: Exploring the performance effects of resource portfolios./
Author:	Sirmon, David Gary.
Description:	127 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-02, Section: A, page: 0606.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International65-02A.
Subject:	Business Administration, Management. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3123625
ISBN:	0496709367

Relative resource strengths, relative resource weaknesses and strategy: Exploring the performance effects of resource portfolios.
Sirmon, David Gary.

Relative resource strengths, relative resource weaknesses and strategy: Exploring the performance effects of resource portfolios. - 127 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-02, Section: A, page: 0606.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2004.

The resource-based view (RBV) has become a cornerstone of strategic management research because it identifies the criteria (i.e., value and rarity) required for resources to be sources of competitive advantage. However, despite its important contributions, the RBV requires further advancement. This dissertation attempts to theoretically and empirically extend the RBV through the examination of two important concepts: the resource portfolio and relative resource holdings.

ISBN: 0496709367Subjects--Topical Terms:

626628
Business Administration, Management.

Relative resource strengths, relative resource weaknesses and strategy: Exploring the performance effects of resource portfolios.
LDR:03619nmm 2200337 4500 001 1841630
005 20050915140256.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
020 $a 0496709367
035 $a (UnM)AAI3123625
035 $a AAI3123625
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Sirmon, David Gary. $3 1929917
245 1 0 $a Relative resource strengths, relative resource weaknesses and strategy: Exploring the performance effects of resource portfolios.
300 $a 127 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-02, Section: A, page: 0606.
500 $a Adviser: Michael A. Hitt.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2004.
520 $a The resource-based view (RBV) has become a cornerstone of strategic management research because it identifies the criteria (i.e., value and rarity) required for resources to be sources of competitive advantage. However, despite its important contributions, the RBV requires further advancement. This dissertation attempts to theoretically and empirically extend the RBV through the examination of two important concepts: the resource portfolio and relative resource holdings.
520 $a Although strategists commonly conceptualize firms as integrated bundles of resources, the majority of research on resource effects has investigated one or a few firm controlled resources at a time. Thus, little is known about the interactions or interdependence of resources within the firm. Additionally, competitive advantage by its very nature is relative. That is, an advantage is only an advantage when it provides a firm positive differentiation from competitors. Therefore, competitive advantage is not accurately specified without relative comparisons of competitors' resources' value and rarity.
520 $a This research addressed both issues by integrating the concepts of the resource portfolio and relativity. Through this integration, the constructs, accumulative relative resource strength and accumulative relative resource weakness are developed. An accumulative relative resource strength is the sum of the firm's individual resources that are capable of producing more value for stakeholders than the firm's average competitor's functionally similar resource. Conversely, an accumulative relative resource weakness is the sum of the firm's individual resources that are capable of producing less value for stakeholders than the firm's average competitor's functionally similar resource.
520 $a Accumulative relative resource strength and weakness are hypothesized to directly and interactively affect firm performance, while additionally moderating the corporate strategy/performance relationship.
520 $a The empirical results from a sample of regional U.S. banks showed that an accumulative relative resource strength has a curvilinear relationship with performance (inverted U-shape), while an accumulative relative resource weakness has a negative relationship with performance. Additionally, an accumulative relative resource weakness negatively moderated the accumulative relative resource strength/performance relationship. Furthermore, service diversification/performance relationship is curvilinear (inverted U-shape), and this relationship is moderated by both accumulative relative resource strength and weakness.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Business Administration, Banking. $3 1018458
650 4 $a Economics, Finance. $3 626650
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0770
690 $a 0508
710 2 0 $a Arizona State University. $3 1017445
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 65-02A.
790 1 0 $a Hitt, Michael A., $e advisor
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3123625