東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Analyst ranking, affiliation, and th...

Chen, Xia.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Analyst ranking, affiliation, and the market reaction to stock recommendations for IPOs.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Analyst ranking, affiliation, and the market reaction to stock recommendations for IPOs./
Author:	Chen, Xia.
Description:	91 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-03, Section: A, page: 1016.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International65-03A.
Subject:	Business Administration, Accounting. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3125588
ISBN:	049672877X

Analyst ranking, affiliation, and the market reaction to stock recommendations for IPOs.
Chen, Xia.

Analyst ranking, affiliation, and the market reaction to stock recommendations for IPOs. - 91 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-03, Section: A, page: 1016.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2004.

This paper studies the association between financial analysts' affiliation and the market reaction to their stock recommendations for IPOs, conditional on analyst ranking (All-American (AA) analysts or not). The sample includes 7,354 stock recommendations issued in the first year for 1,666 IPOs in the period 1996--2000. The major findings are as follows. First, the market reaction is less positive (more negative) for lead underwriter and co-underwriter analysts' favorable (unfavorable) recommendations than for those of unaffiliated analysts. Second, there does not seem to be significant differences between AA and non-AA analysts in terms of the impact of affiliation (lead underwriter or co-underwriter). Third, intraday analyses suggest that the market reacts quickly to information about analysts' affiliation. Lastly, long run abnormal returns after recommendations are not associated with analysts' affiliation. Overall, these findings suggest that the market rationally adjusts for positive biases in affiliated analysts' stock recommendations when recommendations are announced.

ISBN: 049672877XSubjects--Topical Terms:

1020666
Business Administration, Accounting.

Analyst ranking, affiliation, and the market reaction to stock recommendations for IPOs.
LDR:01977nmm 2200277 4500 001 1839110
005 20050629130837.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
020 $a 049672877X
035 $a (UnM)AAI3125588
035 $a AAI3125588
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Chen, Xia. $3 1927514
245 1 0 $a Analyst ranking, affiliation, and the market reaction to stock recommendations for IPOs.
300 $a 91 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-03, Section: A, page: 1016.
500 $a Adviser: Ray Ball.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2004.
520 $a This paper studies the association between financial analysts' affiliation and the market reaction to their stock recommendations for IPOs, conditional on analyst ranking (All-American (AA) analysts or not). The sample includes 7,354 stock recommendations issued in the first year for 1,666 IPOs in the period 1996--2000. The major findings are as follows. First, the market reaction is less positive (more negative) for lead underwriter and co-underwriter analysts' favorable (unfavorable) recommendations than for those of unaffiliated analysts. Second, there does not seem to be significant differences between AA and non-AA analysts in terms of the impact of affiliation (lead underwriter or co-underwriter). Third, intraday analyses suggest that the market reacts quickly to information about analysts' affiliation. Lastly, long run abnormal returns after recommendations are not associated with analysts' affiliation. Overall, these findings suggest that the market rationally adjusts for positive biases in affiliated analysts' stock recommendations when recommendations are announced.
590 $a School code: 0330.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Accounting. $3 1020666
650 4 $a Economics, Finance. $3 626650
690 $a 0272
690 $a 0508
710 2 0 $a The University of Chicago. $3 1017389
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 65-03A.
790 1 0 $a Ball, Ray, $e advisor
790 $a 0330
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3125588