東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The logic of emulation: The diffusio...

Elman, Colin.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The logic of emulation: The diffusion of military practices in the international system.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The logic of emulation: The diffusion of military practices in the international system./
作者:	Elman, Colin.
面頁冊數:	544 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-01, Section: A, page: 0242.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International60-01A.
標題:	Political Science, International Law and Relations. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9916872
ISBN:	0599157445

The logic of emulation: The diffusion of military practices in the international system.
Elman, Colin.

The logic of emulation: The diffusion of military practices in the international system. - 544 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-01, Section: A, page: 0242.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 1999.

This dissertation investigates how states react to other states' military practices. These reactions fall into three categories: emulation, where the new practice is partially or wholly mimicked; off-setting, where the reacting state acts to counter the effects of new military practice; and no change from previous plans, where the potential responder decides not to respond to the information concerning the new military practice being demonstrated. Two explanations are developed and tested in this dissertation: a neo-realist model suggesting that how a state responds to the demonstration of new military practices will depend on the external strategic constraints that it faces; and an organizational model arguing that reactions will be determined by the organizationally derived preferences of military officers. Using the qualitative methodologies of structured focused comparison and process tracing, the two models are tested against the cases of American and Soviet armor development in the interwar period. The conclusion reached is that while both models explain elements of the cases, the neo-realist model is the more robust of the two candidate explanations. In the long run, how states respond to other states' military practices will largely depend on: the threat posed and opportunity offered by the new practice to the reacting state; the quality of information the state has about the new practice, which in turn will usually be a function of the demonstration context in which the state learned about the practice; and the likelihood and severity of war.

ISBN: 0599157445Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017399
Political Science, International Law and Relations.

The logic of emulation: The diffusion of military practices in the international system.
LDR:02975nmm 2200289 4500 001 1838550
005 20050526085431.5
008 130614s1999 eng d
020 $a 0599157445
035 $a (UnM)AAI9916872
035 $a AAI9916872
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Elman, Colin. $3 873097
245 1 4 $a The logic of emulation: The diffusion of military practices in the international system.
300 $a 544 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-01, Section: A, page: 0242.
500 $a Adviser: Robert Jervis.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 1999.
520 $a This dissertation investigates how states react to other states' military practices. These reactions fall into three categories: emulation, where the new practice is partially or wholly mimicked; off-setting, where the reacting state acts to counter the effects of new military practice; and no change from previous plans, where the potential responder decides not to respond to the information concerning the new military practice being demonstrated. Two explanations are developed and tested in this dissertation: a neo-realist model suggesting that how a state responds to the demonstration of new military practices will depend on the external strategic constraints that it faces; and an organizational model arguing that reactions will be determined by the organizationally derived preferences of military officers. Using the qualitative methodologies of structured focused comparison and process tracing, the two models are tested against the cases of American and Soviet armor development in the interwar period. The conclusion reached is that while both models explain elements of the cases, the neo-realist model is the more robust of the two candidate explanations. In the long run, how states respond to other states' military practices will largely depend on: the threat posed and opportunity offered by the new practice to the reacting state; the quality of information the state has about the new practice, which in turn will usually be a function of the demonstration context in which the state learned about the practice; and the likelihood and severity of war.
520 $a This dissertation speaks to several current and important theoretical debates, including the merits of neo-realist and organizational theories of foreign policy; the levels of analysis debate; and the proper relationship between materialist and ideational explanations. The study also has significant policy implications, providing information on the prevention and amelioration of weapons proliferation, arms racing, and the security dilemma; and the provision of efficient security policy.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 1017399
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
690 $a 0616
690 $a 0615
710 2 0 $a Columbia University. $3 571054
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 60-01A.
790 1 0 $a Jervis, Robert, $e advisor
790 $a 0054
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1999
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9916872