東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Comparison of tutor retrieval text, ...

Whitaker, Dan Field.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparison of tutor retrieval text, computer-assisted instruction, and programmed lecture in teaching statistics to physical education majors.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Comparison of tutor retrieval text, computer-assisted instruction, and programmed lecture in teaching statistics to physical education majors./
Author:	Whitaker, Dan Field.
Description:	124 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 51-11, Section: A, page: 3640.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International51-11A.
Subject:	Education, Health. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9107937

Comparison of tutor retrieval text, computer-assisted instruction, and programmed lecture in teaching statistics to physical education majors.
Whitaker, Dan Field.

Comparison of tutor retrieval text, computer-assisted instruction, and programmed lecture in teaching statistics to physical education majors. - 124 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 51-11, Section: A, page: 3640.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Temple University, 1990.

The purpose of the study was to determine whether there was a difference in achievement between physical education majors who were taught statistics using three different methods of instruction: Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI), Tutor Retrieval Text (TRT), and Programmed Lecture (PL).Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017668
Education, Health.

Comparison of tutor retrieval text, computer-assisted instruction, and programmed lecture in teaching statistics to physical education majors.
LDR:02805nmm 2200313 4500 001 1837116
005 20050429080542.5
008 130614s1990 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI9107937
035 $a AAI9107937
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Whitaker, Dan Field. $3 1925577
245 1 0 $a Comparison of tutor retrieval text, computer-assisted instruction, and programmed lecture in teaching statistics to physical education majors.
300 $a 124 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 51-11, Section: A, page: 3640.
500 $a Major Adviser: T. Evaul.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Temple University, 1990.
520 $a The purpose of the study was to determine whether there was a difference in achievement between physical education majors who were taught statistics using three different methods of instruction: Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI), Tutor Retrieval Text (TRT), and Programmed Lecture (PL).
520 $a An experimental design was used; 47 physical education majors were divided into three groups (using a randomized stratified method). Pre-tests were administered and the students' grade point averages were recorded. Subjects received an average of three hours of treatment over a two week period.
520 $a The treatments were identical in content, organization, and type of interaction. The only difference in the treatments was the media through which the subjects received their instruction (i.e., CAI, TRT, or PL). At the end of the treatment period subjects were given a 57 question objective post-test. The amount of time spent learning was recorded in order to measure efficiency.
520 $a An analysis of variance of repeated measures was used to measure within group improvement and between group improvement. An analysis of variance (followed by a post-hoc Tukey test) was used to compare efficiency of learning. The.05 level of significance was utilized to test each hypothesis.
520 $a Statistical analysis resulted in the following findings: (1) There was significant improvement within groups. (2) There was no significant difference in improvement between the groups. (3) There was a significant difference in efficiency between the groups. The PL group was the least efficient; there was no difference in efficiency between the CAI and TRT groups.
520 $a The following conclusions were drawn: (1) CAI, TRT, and PL are equally effective in promoting learning. (2) Self-study methods of instruction (i.e., CAI and TRT) are more efficient than teacher-lead instruction.
590 $a School code: 0225.
650 4 $a Education, Health. $3 1017668
690 $a 0680
710 2 0 $a Temple University. $3 959342
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 51-11A.
790 1 0 $a Evaul, T., $e advisor
790 $a 0225
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 1990
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9107937