東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Mentoring relationships: A study of ...

Barr, Matthew John.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Mentoring relationships: A study of informal/formal mentoring, psychological type of mentors, and mentor/protege type combinations.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Mentoring relationships: A study of informal/formal mentoring, psychological type of mentors, and mentor/protege type combinations./
Author:	Barr, Matthew John.
Description:	213 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-07, Section: A, page: 2568.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International60-07A.
Subject:	Business Administration, Management. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9940453
ISBN:	9780599419285

Mentoring relationships: A study of informal/formal mentoring, psychological type of mentors, and mentor/protege type combinations.
Barr, Matthew John.

Mentoring relationships: A study of informal/formal mentoring, psychological type of mentors, and mentor/protege type combinations. - 213 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-07, Section: A, page: 2568.

Thesis (D.B.A.)--Nova Southeastern University, 1998.

Purpose. Investigates informal and formal mentoring to determine if the protege receives different benefits in the relationship. Identifies psychological type of proteges and mentors in a mentoring relationship to determine if a certain mentor type provides different benefits, and if corresponding psychological type combinations of mentors and proteges provide different benefits to the protege in comparison with other mentor-protege psychological type combinations.

ISBN: 9780599419285Subjects--Topical Terms:

626628
Business Administration, Management.

Mentoring relationships: A study of informal/formal mentoring, psychological type of mentors, and mentor/protege type combinations.
LDR:03254nmm 2200337 4500 001 1830079
005 20070423122832.5
008 130610s1998 eng d
020 $a 9780599419285
035 $a (UnM)AAI9940453
035 $a AAI9940453
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Barr, Matthew John. $3 1918924
245 1 0 $a Mentoring relationships: A study of informal/formal mentoring, psychological type of mentors, and mentor/protege type combinations.
300 $a 213 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-07, Section: A, page: 2568.
500 $a Adviser: Ronald C. Fetzer.
502 $a Thesis (D.B.A.)--Nova Southeastern University, 1998.
520 $a Purpose. Investigates informal and formal mentoring to determine if the protege receives different benefits in the relationship. Identifies psychological type of proteges and mentors in a mentoring relationship to determine if a certain mentor type provides different benefits, and if corresponding psychological type combinations of mentors and proteges provide different benefits to the protege in comparison with other mentor-protege psychological type combinations.
520 $a The research is based on Noe's (1988) theory of identifying variables which impact mentoring relationships. It also integrates Kram's (1980) career and psychosocial functions, Phillips-Jones's (1977, 1982) mentoring model, Jung's (1921/1971) psychological type, and Clore's (1975) attraction theory to determine possible mentoring relationship variables.
520 $a Method. The research examines the career and psychosocial benefits attained by proteges in informal or formal mentoring relationships. This is found by proteges rating their mentors on the Mentoring Functions Scale Questionnaire (MFSQ), (Noe, 1988). Psychological type of proteges and their identified mentors is determined using Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Form G, (Myers & McCaulley 1985).
520 $a Protege responses on the MFSQ provide a comparison of informal and formal mentoring to find if a difference exists among the relationships. Responses on the MFSQ determine the difference in certain mentor types and the difference between corresponding psychological type mentor-protege pairs and other combinations of psychological type mentor-protege pairs.
520 $a Findings. The major findings of the study show there is evidence to support a difference in the level of career and psychosocial benefits between informal and formal mentoring relationships. The study also found no significant level of difference in protege benefits when the mentor or protege is a certain psychological type. Finally, the study reveals that when protege and mentor have similar psychological types, the protege benefits scores tend to be higher. In addition, further analysis found that similarity in gender or race between the protege and mentor did not have a significant impact on proteges' mentoring experience.
590 $a School code: 1191.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Psychology, Industrial. $3 520063
650 4 $a Psychology, Personality. $3 1017585
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0624
690 $a 0625
710 2 0 $a Nova Southeastern University. $3 1017571
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 60-07A.
790 1 0 $a Fetzer, Ronald C., $e advisor
790 $a 1191
791 $a D.B.A.
792 $a 1998
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9940453