東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The social impact of a profession: A...

Moore, Stephanie L.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The social impact of a profession: An analysis of factors influencing ethics and the teaching of social responsibility in educational technology programs.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The social impact of a profession: An analysis of factors influencing ethics and the teaching of social responsibility in educational technology programs./
Author:	Moore, Stephanie L.
Description:	209 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-07, Section: A, page: 2549.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-07A.
Subject:	Education, Technology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3183569
ISBN:	9780542250767

The social impact of a profession: An analysis of factors influencing ethics and the teaching of social responsibility in educational technology programs.
Moore, Stephanie L.

The social impact of a profession: An analysis of factors influencing ethics and the teaching of social responsibility in educational technology programs. - 209 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-07, Section: A, page: 2549.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Northern Colorado, 2005.

Although professional ethics are considered critical to a profession's success, this content is often rarely covered in graduate level programs that train the future leaders. This study examined the specific ethic of social responsibility, looking at the degree to which it is present in programs, in faculty mindsets, and what factors might explain the absence or presence. Social responsibility was operationally defined using Kaufman's (2001) Elements of the Basic Ideal Vision. Other factors that were studied in relationship to social responsibility included demographics, philosophies of technology as defined by Feenberg (1999, 2001) and Barbour (1993), and barriers to integration based on human performance technology research and ethical behavior research (Ford & Richardson, 1994; Stolovich & Keeps, 1999). The results of this study from 169 participants indicated that the construct of social responsibility was a solid construct as measured by Kaufman's Elements of the Basic Ideal Vision, but faculty were not necessarily willing to be committed to it in their professional work. Only the Pessimism subscale of the philosophy instrument had a positive correlation to social responsibility. Furthermore, planning documents from 67 educational technology programs indicated no systematic efforts to integrate social responsibility into programs and vertically align it through program objectives, goals, missions and visions. The results, along with participant comments at the end of the survey, indicate that faculty in educational technology either have not made a paradigm shift to thinking about societal impact in their professional work or do not have a clear cognitive schema for social responsibility that would allow them to teach the content. Possibilities for future research are discussed.

ISBN: 9780542250767Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017498
Education, Technology.

The social impact of a profession: An analysis of factors influencing ethics and the teaching of social responsibility in educational technology programs.
LDR:02785nmm 2200277 4500 001 1823723
005 20061128083819.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542250767
035 $a (UnM)AAI3183569
035 $a AAI3183569
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Moore, Stephanie L. $3 1912821
245 1 4 $a The social impact of a profession: An analysis of factors influencing ethics and the teaching of social responsibility in educational technology programs.
300 $a 209 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-07, Section: A, page: 2549.
500 $a Adviser: Linda L. Lohr.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Northern Colorado, 2005.
520 $a Although professional ethics are considered critical to a profession's success, this content is often rarely covered in graduate level programs that train the future leaders. This study examined the specific ethic of social responsibility, looking at the degree to which it is present in programs, in faculty mindsets, and what factors might explain the absence or presence. Social responsibility was operationally defined using Kaufman's (2001) Elements of the Basic Ideal Vision. Other factors that were studied in relationship to social responsibility included demographics, philosophies of technology as defined by Feenberg (1999, 2001) and Barbour (1993), and barriers to integration based on human performance technology research and ethical behavior research (Ford & Richardson, 1994; Stolovich & Keeps, 1999). The results of this study from 169 participants indicated that the construct of social responsibility was a solid construct as measured by Kaufman's Elements of the Basic Ideal Vision, but faculty were not necessarily willing to be committed to it in their professional work. Only the Pessimism subscale of the philosophy instrument had a positive correlation to social responsibility. Furthermore, planning documents from 67 educational technology programs indicated no systematic efforts to integrate social responsibility into programs and vertically align it through program objectives, goals, missions and visions. The results, along with participant comments at the end of the survey, indicate that faculty in educational technology either have not made a paradigm shift to thinking about societal impact in their professional work or do not have a clear cognitive schema for social responsibility that would allow them to teach the content. Possibilities for future research are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0161.
650 4 $a Education, Technology. $3 1017498
650 4 $a Education, Philosophy of. $3 783746
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0998
710 2 0 $a University of Northern Colorado. $3 1020512
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-07A.
790 1 0 $a Lohr, Linda L., $e advisor
790 $a 0161
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3183569