東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ null ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The return of dialectics (Ferdinand ...

Lokaisingh-Meighoo, Sean.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The return of dialectics (Ferdinand de Saussure, Emmanuel Levinas, Jacques Derrida, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The return of dialectics (Ferdinand de Saussure, Emmanuel Levinas, Jacques Derrida, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel)./
作者:	Lokaisingh-Meighoo, Sean.
面頁冊數:	455 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-01, Section: A, page: 0210.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-01A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR11593
ISBN:	9780494115930

The return of dialectics (Ferdinand de Saussure, Emmanuel Levinas, Jacques Derrida, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel).
Lokaisingh-Meighoo, Sean.

The return of dialectics (Ferdinand de Saussure, Emmanuel Levinas, Jacques Derrida, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel). - 455 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-01, Section: A, page: 0210.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--York University (Canada), 2005.

The 'linguistic turn' in twentieth-century scholarship has been marked by a shift in critical attention from thought and consciousness to language and signification. Across the disciplines of philosophy, history, political science and literary studies alike, this turn away from dialectics and towards linguistics has been proclaimed. The critique of dialectics has been most trenchant in poststructuralist theory. The poststructuralist critique of dialectics generally relies on four theoretical assumptions: that dialectics finds its culmination in the philosophy of Hegel; that dialectics is culturally specific to 'Western' philosophy or metaphysics; that the critique of dialectics entails the end of philosophy or metaphysics; and that poststructuralist theory itself evades all dialectical philosophy. In this dissertation, I submit the poststructuralist critique of dialectics to an interrogation in four corresponding chapters. In the first chapter, I argue that dialectics is best defined not by the triadic structure of the dialectic that Hegel presents in the Phenomenology of Spirit, but rather by the dualist structure of language that Saussure presents in the Course in General Linguistics. In the second chapter, I attend to the dualist structure of dialectics in a survey of the South Asian and East Asian philosophies of Mahayana, Vedanta, Ch'an and Zen, appropriating the theoretical terminology of dualism and non-dualism specifically from Vedanta to describe the problem of dualism that informs all philosophy, whether 'Western' or not. In the third chapter, I employ the terminology of dualism and non-dualism in a close reading of some key texts in twentieth-century phenomenology, existentialism, structuralism and poststructuralism, demonstrating that the poststructuralist critique of dialectics is largely indebted not only to structural linguistics, but also to French dialectical philosophy itself. In the fourth and final chapter of my dissertation, I conclude that poststructuralism is a dialectics, whose radical propositions may certainly be traced back to the dualism of Saussure's theory of language, but whose subversive effects may only be apprehended in the non-dualism of Levinas's concept of diachrony and Derrida's concept of 'differance'. What I am calling the return of dialectics has thus already been staked out by the turn towards linguistics in twentieth-century scholarship.

ISBN: 9780494115930Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.

The return of dialectics (Ferdinand de Saussure, Emmanuel Levinas, Jacques Derrida, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel).
LDR:03267nmm 2200253 4500 001 1821844
005 20061114123403.5
008 130610s2005 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780494115930
035 $a (UnM)AAINR11593
035 $a AAINR11593
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Lokaisingh-Meighoo, Sean. $3 1911007
245 1 4 $a The return of dialectics (Ferdinand de Saussure, Emmanuel Levinas, Jacques Derrida, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel).
300 $a 455 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-01, Section: A, page: 0210.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--York University (Canada), 2005.
520 $a The 'linguistic turn' in twentieth-century scholarship has been marked by a shift in critical attention from thought and consciousness to language and signification. Across the disciplines of philosophy, history, political science and literary studies alike, this turn away from dialectics and towards linguistics has been proclaimed. The critique of dialectics has been most trenchant in poststructuralist theory. The poststructuralist critique of dialectics generally relies on four theoretical assumptions: that dialectics finds its culmination in the philosophy of Hegel; that dialectics is culturally specific to 'Western' philosophy or metaphysics; that the critique of dialectics entails the end of philosophy or metaphysics; and that poststructuralist theory itself evades all dialectical philosophy. In this dissertation, I submit the poststructuralist critique of dialectics to an interrogation in four corresponding chapters. In the first chapter, I argue that dialectics is best defined not by the triadic structure of the dialectic that Hegel presents in the Phenomenology of Spirit, but rather by the dualist structure of language that Saussure presents in the Course in General Linguistics. In the second chapter, I attend to the dualist structure of dialectics in a survey of the South Asian and East Asian philosophies of Mahayana, Vedanta, Ch'an and Zen, appropriating the theoretical terminology of dualism and non-dualism specifically from Vedanta to describe the problem of dualism that informs all philosophy, whether 'Western' or not. In the third chapter, I employ the terminology of dualism and non-dualism in a close reading of some key texts in twentieth-century phenomenology, existentialism, structuralism and poststructuralism, demonstrating that the poststructuralist critique of dialectics is largely indebted not only to structural linguistics, but also to French dialectical philosophy itself. In the fourth and final chapter of my dissertation, I conclude that poststructuralism is a dialectics, whose radical propositions may certainly be traced back to the dualism of Saussure's theory of language, but whose subversive effects may only be apprehended in the non-dualism of Levinas's concept of diachrony and Derrida's concept of 'differance'. What I am calling the return of dialectics has thus already been staked out by the turn towards linguistics in twentieth-century scholarship.
590 $a School code: 0267.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Language, General. $3 1018089
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0679
710 2 0 $a York University (Canada). $3 1017889
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-01A.
790 $a 0267
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR11593