東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Tradition and innovation in the Cons...

Magee, William Albert.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Tradition and innovation in the Consequence School: Nature (rang bzhin, svabhava/prakrti) in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Tradition and innovation in the Consequence School: Nature (rang bzhin, svabhava/prakrti) in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism./
Author:	Magee, William Albert.
Description:	291 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 59-02, Section: A, page: 0523.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International59-02A.
Subject:	Religion, History of. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9824280
ISBN:	9780591764925

Tradition and innovation in the Consequence School: Nature (rang bzhin, svabhava/prakrti) in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism.
Magee, William Albert.

Tradition and innovation in the Consequence School: Nature (rang bzhin, svabhava/prakrti) in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism. - 291 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 59-02, Section: A, page: 0523.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Virginia, 1998.

Nature (rang bzhin, svabhava/prakrti) is a topic in many Indian and Tibetan philosophical texts. The meaning of nature varies between Buddhist and non-Buddhist scriptures and commentaries and within Buddhism itself. The Katha Upanisad depicts nature as the underlying principle of the universe, and in the Bhagdvad Gita, nature is an aspect of Krsna himself. In some Samkhya texts, nature is a basic principle of the universe, unmanifest but present in all phenomena. Buddhist sutras and treatises, on the other hand, speak of nature in the context of three-nature doctrines (ngo bo nyid gsum, trisvabhava) or the emptiness nature.

ISBN: 9780591764925Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017471
Religion, History of.

Tradition and innovation in the Consequence School: Nature (rang bzhin, svabhava/prakrti) in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism.
LDR:03357nmm 2200277 4500 001 1821810
005 20061114123354.5
008 130610s1998 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780591764925
035 $a (UnM)AAI9824280
035 $a AAI9824280
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Magee, William Albert. $3 1910973
245 1 0 $a Tradition and innovation in the Consequence School: Nature (rang bzhin, svabhava/prakrti) in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism.
300 $a 291 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 59-02, Section: A, page: 0523.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Virginia, 1998.
520 $a Nature (rang bzhin, svabhava/prakrti) is a topic in many Indian and Tibetan philosophical texts. The meaning of nature varies between Buddhist and non-Buddhist scriptures and commentaries and within Buddhism itself. The Katha Upanisad depicts nature as the underlying principle of the universe, and in the Bhagdvad Gita, nature is an aspect of Krsna himself. In some Samkhya texts, nature is a basic principle of the universe, unmanifest but present in all phenomena. Buddhist sutras and treatises, on the other hand, speak of nature in the context of three-nature doctrines (ngo bo nyid gsum, trisvabhava) or the emptiness nature.
520 $a Nagarjuna (first century), founder of the Middle Way School (dbu ma pa, madhyamika), refutes a fabricated nature in his Treatise on the Middle (XV)--"Analysis of Nature Chapter" (rang bzhin brtag pa'i rab byed, svabhavapariksa mama prakaranam). He puts forth the three basic criteria for nature: it must be something that is non-fabricated, independent, and immutable. Nagarjuna does not explain whether he is speaking of an existent nature, but Candrakirti (sixth century), considered by many to be the founder of the Consequence School (dbu ma thal 'gyur pa, prasangika-madhyamika), explicitly identifies the triply-qualified nature as emptiness, the reality nature.
520 $a Neither Nagarjuna nor Candrakirti clearly describes an object-of-negation (dgag bya, pratisedhya) nature, but such becomes the focus of discussions of nature by Dzong-ka-ba (1359-1417) and Tibetan Consequentialists in his Ge-luk tradition. In the Great Exposition of the Stages of the Path section (and commentary) translated in this dissertation, Dzong-ka-ba (1) explains how the object-of-negation nature cannot be the triply-qualified nature and (2) brings to the discussion a precise identification of the non-existent object-of-negation nature (dgag bya'i rang bzhin) as being a thing's "establishment by way of its own entity" (rang gi ngo bos grub pa). He also refutes the positive and independent nature asserted by Dol-bo Shay-rap-gyel-tsen (fourteenth century).
520 $a Although Dzong-ka-ba and his followers do not clearly differentiate between traditional positions and Tibetan innovations--and somewhat misleadingly point to Candrakirti as if he were the author of all their opinions--this dissertation shows that significant exegetical innovation is employed by Dzong-ka-ba to delineate the place of nature in the context of refuting an object of negation that is too narrow.
590 $a School code: 0246.
650 4 $a Religion, History of. $3 1017471
690 $a 0320
710 2 0 $a University of Virginia. $3 645578
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 59-02A.
790 $a 0246
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1998
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9824280