東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Discriminatory practices charged und...

McKenna, Maureen A.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Discriminatory practices charged under EEOC: An empirical analysis of investigated complaints filed by those who have cancer.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Discriminatory practices charged under EEOC: An empirical analysis of investigated complaints filed by those who have cancer./
Author:	McKenna, Maureen A.
Description:	87 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-05, Section: A, page: 1650.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-05A.
Subject:	Education, Guidance and Counseling. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3175144
ISBN:	9780542130328

Discriminatory practices charged under EEOC: An empirical analysis of investigated complaints filed by those who have cancer.
McKenna, Maureen A.

Discriminatory practices charged under EEOC: An empirical analysis of investigated complaints filed by those who have cancer. - 87 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-05, Section: A, page: 1650.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2005.

Previously unexplored data from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Integrated Mission System database is analyzed with specific reference to allegations filed by individuals with cancer of workplace discrimination under ADA Title I between July 27, 1992 and September 30, 2003. These allegations are compared to those from a general disability population on key dimensions of workplace discrimination---specifically, demographic characteristics of the charging parties, the industry designation, location, and region site of employers against whom complaints are filed, types of alleged adverse actions and resolution of these complaints.

ISBN: 9780542130328Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017740
Education, Guidance and Counseling.

Discriminatory practices charged under EEOC: An empirical analysis of investigated complaints filed by those who have cancer.
LDR:02545nmm 2200301 4500 001 1821152
005 20061110072526.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542130328
035 $a (UnM)AAI3175144
035 $a AAI3175144
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a McKenna, Maureen A. $3 1910345
245 1 0 $a Discriminatory practices charged under EEOC: An empirical analysis of investigated complaints filed by those who have cancer.
300 $a 87 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-05, Section: A, page: 1650.
500 $a Chair: Ellen Fabian.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2005.
520 $a Previously unexplored data from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Integrated Mission System database is analyzed with specific reference to allegations filed by individuals with cancer of workplace discrimination under ADA Title I between July 27, 1992 and September 30, 2003. These allegations are compared to those from a general disability population on key dimensions of workplace discrimination---specifically, demographic characteristics of the charging parties, the industry designation, location, and region site of employers against whom complaints are filed, types of alleged adverse actions and resolution of these complaints.
520 $a Study results showed allegations derived from charging parties with cancer are more likely than those from the general disability population studied to involve issues of discharge, terms and conditions of employment, lay-offs, wages and terms conditions of employment and demotion. Compared to the general disability group, charging parties with cancer were more likely to be female, approximately 47 years of age and Caucasian. Allegations derived from charging parties with cancer were also more likely to be filed against smaller employers (15--100 workers) or those in the service industries compared to those from the general disability population. Claims filed by those with cancer were likely to be found to have merit more than those filed from the general disability population. Implications for rehabilitation counselor education are addressed and recommendations for further research are provided.
590 $a School code: 0117.
650 4 $a Education, Guidance and Counseling. $3 1017740
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Rehabilitation and Therapy. $3 1017926
650 4 $a Sociology, Industrial and Labor Relations. $3 1017858
690 $a 0519
690 $a 0382
690 $a 0629
710 2 0 $a University of Maryland, College Park. $3 657686
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-05A.
790 1 0 $a Fabian, Ellen, $e advisor
790 $a 0117
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3175144